• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单节段腰椎退变中miniopen与微创经椎间孔椎间融合术的比较。

Comparing miniopen and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion in single-level lumbar degeneration.

作者信息

Lo Wei-Lun, Lin Chien-Min, Yeh Yi-Shian, Su Yu-Kai, Tseng Yuan-Yun, Yang Shun-Tai, Lin Jai-Wei

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan ; Keelung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Keelung, Taiwan ; Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan ; Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan ; University of Fukui Faculty of Medical Sciences, Fukui, Japan.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:168384. doi: 10.1155/2015/168384. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1155/2015/168384
PMID:25629037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4299488/
Abstract

Degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine, which are common among elderly people, cause back pain and radicular symptoms and lead to a poor quality of life. Lumbar spinal fusion is a standardized and widely accepted surgical procedure used for treating degenerative lumbar diseases; however, the classical posterior approach used in this procedure is recognized to cause vascular and neurologic damage of the lumbar muscles. Various studies have suggested that using the minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) technique provides long-term clinical outcomes comparable to those of open TLIF approaches in selected patients. In this study, we compared the perioperative and short-term advantages of miniopen, MI, and open TLIF. Compared with open TLIF, MI-TLIF and miniopen TLIF were associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and longer operative times; however, following the use of these procedures, no difference in quality of life was measured at 6 months or 1 year. Whether miniopen TLIF or MI-TLIF can replace traditional TLIF as the surgery of choice for treating degenerative lumbar deformity remains unclear, and additional studies are required for validating the safety and efficiency of these procedures.

摘要

腰椎退行性疾病在老年人中很常见,会引起背痛和神经根症状,导致生活质量下降。腰椎融合术是一种用于治疗退行性腰椎疾病的标准化且被广泛接受的外科手术;然而,该手术中使用的经典后路方法被认为会导致腰椎肌肉的血管和神经损伤。各种研究表明,在特定患者中,使用微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)技术可提供与开放TLIF方法相当的长期临床效果。在本研究中,我们比较了微创开放、微创和开放TLIF的围手术期和短期优势。与开放TLIF相比,微创TLIF和微创开放TLIF的失血量更少、住院时间更短、手术时间更长;然而,在使用这些手术后,6个月或1年时生活质量没有差异。微创开放TLIF或微创TLIF是否能取代传统TLIF作为治疗退行性腰椎畸形的首选手术尚不清楚,需要更多研究来验证这些手术的安全性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f5/4299488/02e968d27023/BMRI2015-168384.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f5/4299488/c4380a12507f/BMRI2015-168384.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f5/4299488/02e968d27023/BMRI2015-168384.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f5/4299488/c4380a12507f/BMRI2015-168384.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30f5/4299488/02e968d27023/BMRI2015-168384.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing miniopen and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion in single-level lumbar degeneration.单节段腰椎退变中miniopen与微创经椎间孔椎间融合术的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:168384. doi: 10.1155/2015/168384. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
2
Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与传统腰椎融合术围手术期及12个月生活方式结局的比较。
Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;31(2):167-171. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2016.1199790. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
3
Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术中及围手术期并发症:513例患者的回顾性研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May;22(5):487-95. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14129. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
4
Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.比较肥胖患者行开放式与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的围手术期结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug;35(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2013.5.FOCUS13154.
5
Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.两种微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Oct;26(7):745-51. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1755-1. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
6
The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的手术技术
J Neurosurg Sci. 2011 Sep;55(3):259-64.
7
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:技术描述及文献综述
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Jun;159(6):1137-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3078-3. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
8
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗肥胖患者的临床疗效比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):644-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13794. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
9
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?肥胖患者腰椎手术的前瞻性、多机构比较有效性研究:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术是否能带来更好的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
10
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的比较:有效性和成本效用分析。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.041. Epub 2013 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Limited Intervention in Adult Scoliosis-A Systematic Review.成人脊柱侧弯的有限干预——一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 11;13(4):1030. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041030.
2
Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide.定义微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:对全球外科医生所使用技术和工艺的系统评价
Global Spine J. 2020 Apr;10(2 Suppl):151S-167S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219882346. Epub 2020 May 28.
3
An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcomes comparing minimally invasive with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar diseases.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review with meta-analysis of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis.腰椎滑脱症后路椎间融合与后外侧融合的系统评价及荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan;23(1):43-56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2880-8. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
2
Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的学习曲线和临床结果:我们在 86 例连续病例中的经验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 15;37(18):1548-57. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318252d44b.
3
The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
一项比较微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病患者临床结局的更新荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(43):e17420. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017420.
4
Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Dec 1;24:8693-8698. doi: 10.12659/MSM.912808.
5
Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与腰椎外侧椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病的临床疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Jul;41(3):755-770. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0806-8. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
6
Miniopen Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Fixation: A Comparison between Ipsilateral and Contralateral Reherniation.单侧固定微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术:同侧与对侧复发的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7261027. doi: 10.1155/2016/7261027. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
7
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病:系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2015 May;24(5):1017-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3903-4. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的手术技术
J Neurosurg Sci. 2011 Sep;55(3):259-64.
4
Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: long-term outcome, morbidity, and the learning curve from the first 50 cases.微创腰椎减压术:前50例的长期疗效、发病率及学习曲线
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Feb;25(1):47-51. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31820baa1e.
5
Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术 (TLIF) 技术学习相关的并发症和围手术期因素。
J Clin Neurosci. 2011 May;18(5):624-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.09.004. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
6
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术
Surg Neurol Int. 2010 May 31;1:12. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.63905.
7
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.经皮椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):1615-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c70fe3.
8
Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.对比退行性和峡部裂性 1 度和 2 度滑脱的单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Oct;19(10):1780-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1404-z. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
9
Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction.微创与传统开放后路腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退行性滑脱:椎旁肌损伤和滑脱复位的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1923-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a9d28e.
10
Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床及影像学结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 1;34(13):1385-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4e3be.