• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急性病环境中对高风险药物进行双重核对:一个更安全的流程。

Double-checking high-risk medications in acute settings: a safer process.

作者信息

Kellett Pollyanna, Gottwald Mary

机构信息

Buckinghamshire New University.

出版信息

Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2015 Feb;21(9):16-22. doi: 10.7748/nm.21.9.16.e1310.

DOI:10.7748/nm.21.9.16.e1310
PMID:25629347
Abstract

There is a need to reduce medication errors, and one way of achieving this for high-risk medications is by double-checking. This article reports the results of a literature review, undertaken as part of an MSc, which examined safe processes for double-checking. The article discusses three themes that emerged from the review: the evidence and processes of double-checking, supportive safety measures and human factors. The review concluded that two people double-checking the entire process enhances and strengthens practice, and that clinical settings and contexts are important to safety in medication administration. The aim of the article is to provide evidence for nurse managers to support their decision making on safe administration practice in clinical settings.

摘要

有必要减少用药错误,而对高风险药物而言,实现这一目标的一种方法是进行双人核对。本文报告了一项文献综述的结果,该综述是作为理学硕士课程的一部分进行的,研究了双人核对的安全流程。本文讨论了综述中出现的三个主题:双人核对的证据和流程、支持性安全措施以及人为因素。综述得出结论,两人对整个过程进行双人核对可增强和强化实践,并且临床环境和背景对用药管理的安全性很重要。本文的目的是为护士长提供证据,以支持他们在临床环境中就安全给药实践做出决策。

相似文献

1
Double-checking high-risk medications in acute settings: a safer process.在急性病环境中对高风险药物进行双重核对:一个更安全的流程。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2015 Feb;21(9):16-22. doi: 10.7748/nm.21.9.16.e1310.
2
Paediatric nurses' adherence to the double-checking process during medication administration in a children's hospital: an observational study.儿童医院儿科护士在给药过程中对双重核对流程的遵守情况:一项观察性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jun;70(6):1404-13. doi: 10.1111/jan.12303. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
3
Medication double-checking procedures in clinical practice: a cross-sectional survey of oncology nurses' experiences.临床实践中的用药双重核对程序:一项关于肿瘤护理人员经验的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 13;6(6):e011394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011394.
4
Nurses' knowledge about the double-checking process for medicines administration.护士对药品给药双人核对流程的了解。
Nurs Child Young People. 2014 Nov;26(9):21-6. doi: 10.7748/ncyp.26.9.21.e378.
5
'Single-checked' Patient Group Directions during initial nurse assessment within paediatric emergency departments of the UK and Ireland.英国和爱尔兰儿科急诊病房初始护士评估期间的“单检”患者医嘱。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;25(3):216-220. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000447.
6
Paediatric nurses' understanding of the process and procedure of double-checking medications.儿科护士对药物双人核对过程和程序的理解。
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Mar;19(5-6):728-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03130.x.
7
An exploration of pediatric nurses' compliance with a medication checking and administration protocol.儿科护士对用药核对与给药规程依从性的探究。
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2012 Apr;17(2):136-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2012.00331.x.
8
Administering medication to adult patients with dysphagia: part 2.
Nurs Stand. 2010;24(26):61-8.
9
Double checking the administration of medicines: what is the evidence? A systematic review.双重核对用药管理:有何证据?系统评价。
Arch Dis Child. 2012 Sep;97(9):833-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301093. Epub 2012 May 1.
10
How graduate nurses use protocols to manage patients' medications.研究生护士如何使用方案来管理患者的药物治疗。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Sep;14(8):935-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01234.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating deviations and considerations in daily practice when double-checking high-risk medication administration: A qualitative study using the FRAM.在对高风险药物给药进行二次核对时评估日常实践中的偏差和注意事项:一项使用功能共振分析方法的定性研究
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 1;10(4):e25637. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25637. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
2
Biometric palm vein authentication of psychiatric patients for reducing in-hospital medication errors: a pre-post observational study.生物特征掌静脉认证在减少精神科住院患者用药错误中的应用:一项前后观测研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e055107. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055107.
3
Can using the functional resonance analysis method, as an intervention, improve patient safety in hospitals?: a stepped wedge design protocol.
可否使用功能共振分析方法作为干预措施来提高医院患者安全性?一项阶梯式楔形设计方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 13;21(1):1228. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07244-z.
4
A Systematic Review of the Legal Considerations Surrounding Medicines Management.围绕药品管理的法律考量的系统评价
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 13;57(1):65. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010065.
5
Effectiveness of double checking to reduce medication administration errors: a systematic review.双重核对以减少给药错误的效果:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jul;29(7):595-603. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009552. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
6
Medication Safety: A Need to Relook at Double-Checking Medicines?用药安全:是否需要重新审视药品双人核对制度?
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Jul-Sep;6(3):246-252. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_2_19.
7
Qualitative exploration of practices to prevent medication errors in neonatal intensive care units: a focus group study.新生儿重症监护病房预防用药错误实践的定性探索:一项焦点小组研究
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 Jul;9(7):343-353. doi: 10.1177/2042098618771541. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
8
Procedural and documentation variations in intravenous infusion administration: a mixed methods study of policy and practice across 16 hospital trusts in England.静脉输液给药的程序与记录差异:一项针对英格兰16家医院信托机构政策与实践的混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3025-x.