Yin Jiandong, Yang Jiawen, Guo Qiyong
Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Neuroradiology. 2015 May;57(5):535-43. doi: 10.1007/s00234-015-1493-9. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
Arterial input function (AIF) plays an important role in the quantification of cerebral hemodynamics. The purpose of this study was to select the best reproducible clustering method for AIF detection by comparing three algorithms reported previously in terms of detection accuracy and computational complexity.
First, three reproducible clustering methods, normalized cut (Ncut), hierarchy (HIER), and fast affine propagation (FastAP), were applied independently to simulated data which contained the true AIF. Next, a clinical verification was performed where 42 subjects participated in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) scanning. The manual AIF and AIFs based on the different algorithms were obtained. The performance of each algorithm was evaluated based on shape parameters of the estimated AIFs and the true or manual AIF. Moreover, the execution time of each algorithm was recorded to determine the algorithm that operated more rapidly in clinical practice.
In terms of the detection accuracy, Ncut and HIER method produced similar AIF detection results, which were closer to the expected AIF and more accurate than those obtained using FastAP method; in terms of the computational efficiency, the Ncut method required the shortest execution time.
Ncut clustering appears promising because it facilitates the automatic and robust determination of AIF with high accuracy and efficiency.
动脉输入函数(AIF)在脑血流动力学定量分析中起着重要作用。本研究的目的是通过比较之前报道的三种算法在检测准确性和计算复杂性方面的表现,选择用于AIF检测的最佳可重复聚类方法。
首先,将三种可重复聚类方法,即归一化切割(Ncut)、层次聚类(HIER)和快速仿射传播(FastAP),分别独立应用于包含真实AIF的模拟数据。接下来,进行了一项临床验证,42名受试者参与了动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像(DSC-MRI)扫描。获得了手动AIF以及基于不同算法的AIF。基于估计的AIF和真实或手动AIF的形状参数评估了每种算法的性能。此外,记录了每种算法的执行时间,以确定在临床实践中运行更快的算法。
在检测准确性方面,Ncut和HIER方法产生了相似的AIF检测结果,这些结果更接近预期的AIF,并且比使用FastAP方法获得的结果更准确;在计算效率方面,Ncut方法所需的执行时间最短。
Ncut聚类似乎很有前景,因为它有助于以高精度和高效率自动且稳健地确定AIF。