• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像中动脉输入函数的自动确定:不同可重复聚类算法的比较

Automatic determination of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: comparison of different reproducible clustering algorithms.

作者信息

Yin Jiandong, Yang Jiawen, Guo Qiyong

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2015 May;57(5):535-43. doi: 10.1007/s00234-015-1493-9. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00234-015-1493-9
PMID:25633539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4412433/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Arterial input function (AIF) plays an important role in the quantification of cerebral hemodynamics. The purpose of this study was to select the best reproducible clustering method for AIF detection by comparing three algorithms reported previously in terms of detection accuracy and computational complexity.

METHODS

First, three reproducible clustering methods, normalized cut (Ncut), hierarchy (HIER), and fast affine propagation (FastAP), were applied independently to simulated data which contained the true AIF. Next, a clinical verification was performed where 42 subjects participated in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) scanning. The manual AIF and AIFs based on the different algorithms were obtained. The performance of each algorithm was evaluated based on shape parameters of the estimated AIFs and the true or manual AIF. Moreover, the execution time of each algorithm was recorded to determine the algorithm that operated more rapidly in clinical practice.

RESULTS

In terms of the detection accuracy, Ncut and HIER method produced similar AIF detection results, which were closer to the expected AIF and more accurate than those obtained using FastAP method; in terms of the computational efficiency, the Ncut method required the shortest execution time.

CONCLUSION

Ncut clustering appears promising because it facilitates the automatic and robust determination of AIF with high accuracy and efficiency.

摘要

引言

动脉输入函数(AIF)在脑血流动力学定量分析中起着重要作用。本研究的目的是通过比较之前报道的三种算法在检测准确性和计算复杂性方面的表现,选择用于AIF检测的最佳可重复聚类方法。

方法

首先,将三种可重复聚类方法,即归一化切割(Ncut)、层次聚类(HIER)和快速仿射传播(FastAP),分别独立应用于包含真实AIF的模拟数据。接下来,进行了一项临床验证,42名受试者参与了动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像(DSC-MRI)扫描。获得了手动AIF以及基于不同算法的AIF。基于估计的AIF和真实或手动AIF的形状参数评估了每种算法的性能。此外,记录了每种算法的执行时间,以确定在临床实践中运行更快的算法。

结果

在检测准确性方面,Ncut和HIER方法产生了相似的AIF检测结果,这些结果更接近预期的AIF,并且比使用FastAP方法获得的结果更准确;在计算效率方面,Ncut方法所需的执行时间最短。

结论

Ncut聚类似乎很有前景,因为它有助于以高精度和高效率自动且稳健地确定AIF。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2362/4412433/7a87da23f714/234_2015_1493_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2362/4412433/2906dcc042cf/234_2015_1493_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2362/4412433/a6513937acc5/234_2015_1493_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2362/4412433/7a87da23f714/234_2015_1493_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2362/4412433/2906dcc042cf/234_2015_1493_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2362/4412433/a6513937acc5/234_2015_1493_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2362/4412433/7a87da23f714/234_2015_1493_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Automatic determination of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: comparison of different reproducible clustering algorithms.动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像中动脉输入函数的自动确定:不同可重复聚类算法的比较
Neuroradiology. 2015 May;57(5):535-43. doi: 10.1007/s00234-015-1493-9. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
2
Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging.利用归一化割聚类自动检测动脉输入函数,通过动态磁敏感对比磁共振成像确定脑灌注。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):1071-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24642. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
3
Evaluating the feasibility of an agglomerative hierarchy clustering algorithm for the automatic detection of the arterial input function using DSC-MRI.评估一种凝聚层次聚类算法用于利用动态对比增强磁共振成像自动检测动脉输入函数的可行性。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 16;9(6):e100308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100308. eCollection 2014.
4
Automatic detection of arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI based on affinity propagation clustering.基于亲和传播聚类的动态对比增强磁共振成像中动脉输入函数的自动检测
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 May;39(5):1327-37. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24259. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
5
Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.通过使用动态对比增强 MRI 的动脉输入函数,提高动态磁化率对比 MRI 中灌注估计的可靠性。
NMR Biomed. 2024 Jan;37(1):e5038. doi: 10.1002/nbm.5038. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
6
Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis.使用聚类分析自动选择动脉输入函数。
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Mar;55(3):524-31. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20759.
7
Automatic selection of arterial input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.动态对比增强磁共振图像中动脉输入功能的自动选择。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011 Dec;104(3):e148-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
8
Automated perfusion-weighted MRI using localized arterial input functions.使用局部动脉输入函数的自动灌注加权磁共振成像。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Nov;24(5):1133-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20717.
9
Arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) in longitudinal evaluation of brain metastases.动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像(DSC-MRI)中动脉输入函数在脑转移瘤纵向评估中的应用
Acta Radiol. 2023 Mar;64(3):1166-1174. doi: 10.1177/02841851221109702. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
10
Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation.校正动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像中动脉输入函数的饱和效应:蒙特卡罗模拟
Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Nov;25(9):1300-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning for Perfusion Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) and Volume (CBV) Predictions and Diagnostics.深度学习在灌注脑血流(CBF)和体积(CBV)预测和诊断中的应用。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Jun;52(6):1568-1575. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03471-7. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
2
Assessing Tumour Haemodynamic Heterogeneity and Response to Choline Kinase Inhibition Using Clustered Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Parameters in Rodent Models of Glioblastoma.在胶质母细胞瘤啮齿动物模型中,使用聚类动态对比增强磁共振成像参数评估肿瘤血流动力学异质性及对胆碱激酶抑制的反应。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 26;14(5):1223. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051223.
3
Quantitative transport mapping (QTM) for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesion: Comparison with traditional kinetics modeling and semi-quantitative enhancement curve characteristics.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic value of blood flow estimated by arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging in high-grade gliomas.动脉自旋标记和动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像评估的血流在高级别胶质瘤中的预后价值
J Neurooncol. 2014 Dec;120(3):557-66. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1586-z. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
2
Prognostic value of blood flow measurements using arterial spin labeling in gliomas.动脉自旋标记血流测量在胶质瘤中的预后价值。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 9;9(6):e99616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099616. eCollection 2014.
3
Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging.
定量转运图(QTM)用于鉴别良恶性乳腺病变:与传统动力学建模和半定量增强曲线特征的比较。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Feb;86:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.10.039. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
4
An Efficient Framework for Accurate Arterial Input Selection in DSC-MRI of Glioma Brain Tumors.一种用于脑胶质瘤DSC-MRI中准确动脉输入选择的高效框架。
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019 Feb 1;9(1):69-80. eCollection 2019 Feb.
5
Perfusion weighted imaging using combined gradient/spin echo EPIK: Brain tumour applications in hybrid MR-PET.使用组合梯度/自旋回波 EPIK 的灌注加权成像:混合 MR-PET 中的脑肿瘤应用。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Sep;42(13):4144-4154. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24537. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
6
Semiautomatic determination of arterial input function in DCE-MRI of the abdomen.腹部动态对比增强磁共振成像中动脉输入函数的半自动测定
J Biomed Eng Med Imaging. 2017;4(2):96-104. doi: 10.14738/jbemi.42.3041. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
利用归一化割聚类自动检测动脉输入函数,通过动态磁敏感对比磁共振成像确定脑灌注。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):1071-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24642. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
4
Comparison of K-means and fuzzy c-means algorithm performance for automated determination of the arterial input function.用于自动确定动脉输入函数的K均值算法和模糊C均值算法性能比较
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e85884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085884. eCollection 2014.
5
Automatic detection of arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI based on affinity propagation clustering.基于亲和传播聚类的动态对比增强磁共振成像中动脉输入函数的自动检测
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 May;39(5):1327-37. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24259. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
6
Arterial input function in perfusion MRI: a comprehensive review.灌注 MRI 的动脉输入函数:全面综述。
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2013 Oct;74:1-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 11.
7
Quantitative assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI, without the need for arterial blood signals.动态磁敏感对比增强 MRI 定量评估局部脑血流,无需动脉血信号。
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Dec 7;57(23):7873-92. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/7873. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
8
A control point interpolation method for the non-parametric quantification of cerebral haemodynamics from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.一种基于动态磁敏感对比 MRI 的脑血流动力学非参数定量的控制点内插方法。
Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 1;64:560-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.083. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
9
Correction for arterial-tissue delay and dispersion in absolute quantitative cerebral perfusion DSC MR imaging.校正绝对定量脑灌注 DSC MR 成像中的动脉组织延迟和弥散。
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Aug;68(2):495-506. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23257. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
10
Diagnostic performance of PWI/DWI MRI parameters in discriminating hyperacute versus acute ischaemic stroke: finding the best thresholds.PWI/DWI MRI 参数在鉴别超急性期与急性期缺血性卒中中的诊断性能:寻找最佳阈值。
Clin Radiol. 2012 Mar;67(3):250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Oct 21.