Magalhães Eunice, Calheiros María M
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Cis-IUL, Lisboa (Portugal).
Psicothema. 2015;27(1):65-73. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.40.
Although the significant scientific advances on place attachment literature, no instruments exist specifically developed or adapted to residential care.
410 adolescents (11 - 18 years old) participated in this study. The place attachment scale evaluates five dimensions: Place identity, Place dependence, Institutional bonding, Caregivers bonding and Friend bonding. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, content validity, construct validity (Confirmatory Factor Analysis), concurrent validity with correlations with satisfaction with life and with institution, and reliability evidences. The relationship with individual characteristics and placement length was also verified.
Content validity analysis revealed that more than half of the panellists perceive all the items as relevant to assess the construct in residential care. The structure with five dimensions revealed good fit statistics and concurrent validity evidences were found, with significant correlations with satisfaction with life and with the institution. Acceptable values of internal consistence and specific gender differences were found.
The preliminary psychometric properties of this scale suggest it potential to be used with youth in care.
尽管在场所依恋文献方面取得了重大科学进展,但尚无专门为机构照料开发或改编的工具。
410名青少年(11至18岁)参与了本研究。场所依恋量表评估五个维度:场所认同、场所依赖、机构联结、照料者联结和朋友联结。数据分析包括描述性统计、内容效度、结构效度(验证性因素分析)、与生活满意度和机构满意度的相关性的同时效度,以及可靠性证据。还验证了与个体特征和安置时长的关系。
内容效度分析表明,超过一半的专家小组成员认为所有项目都与评估机构照料中的结构相关。具有五个维度的结构显示出良好的拟合统计量,同时效度证据也被发现,与生活满意度和机构满意度存在显著相关性。发现了可接受的内部一致性值和特定的性别差异。
该量表的初步心理测量特性表明其有潜力用于照料中的青少年。