Suppr超能文献

单切口经脐全子宫切除术:机器人手术还是腹腔镜手术?

Single incision trans-umbilical total hysterectomy: robotic or laparoscopic?

作者信息

Akdemir Ali, Yildirim Nuri, Zeybek Burak, Karaman Semra, Sendag Fatih

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015;80(2):93-8. doi: 10.1159/000370000. Epub 2015 Jan 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the early surgical outcomes in patients who underwent total hysterectomy with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS-TH) versus robotic single-site total hysterectomy (RSS-TH).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients who underwent RSS-​TH and thirty-four patients who underwent LESS-TH were retrospectively evaluated. Patient characteristics, operation time, intraoperative data (conversions, complications, estimated blood loss, etc.) and postoperative pain scores were compared.

RESULTS

The total operation time was significantly longer in the robotic surgery group, with a time of 98.5 vs. 86 min (p = 0.013), while vaginal closure time was significantly higher in the laparoscopic surgery group (p = 0.011). Intraoperative outcomes and postoperative pain scores were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

RSS-TH helps surgeons to overcome the technical disadvantages of LESS-TH, particularly vaginal cuff closure, ergonomics and instrument crowding and clashing. Early surgical outcomes are comparable in the two groups, and both techniques are safe and feasible.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较接受经腹腔镜单孔手术全子宫切除术(LESS-TH)与机器人单孔全子宫切除术(RSS-TH)患者的早期手术结果。

方法

回顾性评估24例行RSS-TH的患者和34例行LESS-TH的患者。比较患者特征、手术时间、术中数据(中转情况、并发症、估计失血量等)及术后疼痛评分。

结果

机器人手术组的总手术时间显著更长,分别为98.5分钟和86分钟(p = 0.013),而腹腔镜手术组的阴道关闭时间显著更长(p = 0.011)。两组的术中结果及术后疼痛评分相似。

结论

RSS-TH有助于外科医生克服LESS-TH的技术缺点,特别是阴道残端闭合、人体工程学以及器械拥挤和碰撞问题。两组的早期手术结果相当,两种技术均安全可行。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验