Akdemir Ali, Yildirim Nuri, Zeybek Burak, Karaman Semra, Sendag Fatih
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015;80(2):93-8. doi: 10.1159/000370000. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
The aim of this study was to compare the early surgical outcomes in patients who underwent total hysterectomy with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS-TH) versus robotic single-site total hysterectomy (RSS-TH).
Twenty-four patients who underwent RSS-TH and thirty-four patients who underwent LESS-TH were retrospectively evaluated. Patient characteristics, operation time, intraoperative data (conversions, complications, estimated blood loss, etc.) and postoperative pain scores were compared.
The total operation time was significantly longer in the robotic surgery group, with a time of 98.5 vs. 86 min (p = 0.013), while vaginal closure time was significantly higher in the laparoscopic surgery group (p = 0.011). Intraoperative outcomes and postoperative pain scores were similar in the two groups.
RSS-TH helps surgeons to overcome the technical disadvantages of LESS-TH, particularly vaginal cuff closure, ergonomics and instrument crowding and clashing. Early surgical outcomes are comparable in the two groups, and both techniques are safe and feasible.
本研究旨在比较接受经腹腔镜单孔手术全子宫切除术(LESS-TH)与机器人单孔全子宫切除术(RSS-TH)患者的早期手术结果。
回顾性评估24例行RSS-TH的患者和34例行LESS-TH的患者。比较患者特征、手术时间、术中数据(中转情况、并发症、估计失血量等)及术后疼痛评分。
机器人手术组的总手术时间显著更长,分别为98.5分钟和86分钟(p = 0.013),而腹腔镜手术组的阴道关闭时间显著更长(p = 0.011)。两组的术中结果及术后疼痛评分相似。
RSS-TH有助于外科医生克服LESS-TH的技术缺点,特别是阴道残端闭合、人体工程学以及器械拥挤和碰撞问题。两组的早期手术结果相当,两种技术均安全可行。