Suppr超能文献

机器人子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:一项匹配病例对照研究的结局和成本分析。

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Robotic surgery, with its technical advances, promises to open a new window to minimally invasive surgery in gynaecology. Feasibility and safety of this surgical innovation have been demonstrated in several studies, and now a critical analysis of these new developments regarding outcome and costs is in place. So far only a few studies compare robotic with conventional laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology. Our objective was to evaluate our initial experience performing total robot-assisted hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system and compare peri-operative outcome and costs with total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

For this prospective matched case-control study at our institution, peri-operative data from our first 40 consecutive total robot-assisted hysterectomies for benign indications were recorded and matched 1:1 with total laparoscopic hysterectomies according to age, BMI and uterus weight. Surgical costs were calculated for both procedures. Surgeons' subjective impressions of robotics were evaluated with a self-developed questionnaire.

RESULTS

No conversions to laparotomy or severe peri-operative complications occurred. Mean operating time was 109 (113; 50-170) min for the robotic group and 83 (80; 55-165) min for the conventional laparoscopic group. Mean postoperative hospitalisation for robotic surgery was 3.3 (3; 2-6) days versus 3.9 (4; 2-7) days for the conventional laparoscopic group. Average surgical cost of a robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy was 4067 euros compared to 2151 euros for the conventional laparoscopic procedure at our institution. For the robotic group wider range of motion of the instruments and better ergonomics were considered to be an advantage, and lack of direct access to the patient was stated as a disadvantage.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assited hysterectomy is a feasible and interesting new technique with comparable outcome to total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Operating times of total laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to be achieved quickly especially for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. However, costs of robotic surgery are still higher than for conventional laparoscopy. Randomised clinical trials need to be conducted to further evaluate benefits of this new technology for patients and surgeons and analyse its cost-effectiveness in gynaecology.

摘要

目的

机器人手术具有技术先进的特点,有望为妇科微创外科开辟新的窗口。在多项研究中已经证明了这种手术创新的可行性和安全性,现在正在对这些新发展的结果和成本进行严格分析。到目前为止,只有少数研究比较了机器人手术与妇科传统腹腔镜手术。我们的目的是评估我们使用达芬奇手术系统进行全机器人辅助子宫切除术的初步经验,并比较两种手术的围手术期结果和成本。

设计

这是我们机构的一项前瞻性配对病例对照研究,记录了我们前 40 例连续的机器人辅助全子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的围手术期数据,并根据年龄、BMI 和子宫重量与全腹腔镜子宫切除术进行 1:1 配对。计算了两种手术的手术费用。外科医生使用自行开发的问卷评估了对机器人技术的主观印象。

结果

没有转为剖腹手术或严重的围手术期并发症。机器人组的平均手术时间为 109(113;50-170)分钟,传统腹腔镜组为 83(80;55-165)分钟。机器人手术的平均术后住院时间为 3.3(3;2-6)天,而传统腹腔镜组为 3.9(4;2-7)天。在我们机构,机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术的平均手术费用为 4067 欧元,而传统腹腔镜手术为 2151 欧元。对于机器人组,仪器的更大运动范围和更好的人体工程学被认为是优势,而缺乏直接接触患者被认为是劣势。

结论

机器人辅助子宫切除术是一种可行且有趣的新技术,其结果与全腹腔镜子宫切除术相当。全腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术时间似乎很快就能达到,尤其是对于有经验的腹腔镜外科医生。然而,机器人手术的成本仍然高于传统腹腔镜手术。需要进行随机临床试验来进一步评估这项新技术对患者和外科医生的益处,并分析其在妇科中的成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验