Orom Heather, Cline Rebecca J W, Hernandez Tanis, Berry-Bobovski Lisa, Schwartz Ann G, Ruckdeschel John C
University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.
J Fam Issues. 2012 Oct;33(10):1299-1323. doi: 10.1177/0192513X11430821.
With increasing numbers of communities harmed by exposures to toxic substances, greater understanding of the psychosocial consequences of these technological disasters is needed. One community living the consequences of a slow-motion technological disaster is Libby, Montana, where, for nearly 70 years, amphibole asbestos-contaminated vermiculite was mined and processed. Former mine employees and Libby area residents continue to cope with the health consequences of occupational and environmental asbestos exposure and with the psychosocial challenges accompanying chronic and often fatal asbestos-related diseases (ARD). Nine focus groups were conducted with Libby area residents. Transcripts were analyzed to explore patterns of family communication about ARD. The following five patterns emerged: Open/Supportive, Silent/Supportive, Open/Conflictual, Silent/Conflictual, and Silent/Denial. Open/Supportive communication included encouragement to be screened for ARD, information about ARD and related disaster topics, and emotional support for people with ARD. In contrast, communication patterns characterized by silence or conflict have the potential to hinder health-promoting communication and increase psychological distress.
随着越来越多的社区因接触有毒物质而受到伤害,人们需要更深入地了解这些技术灾难的心理社会后果。蒙大拿州的利比就是一个正在承受缓慢发展的技术灾难后果的社区,在那里,含有闪石石棉的蛭石被开采和加工了近70年。前矿场员工和利比地区居民仍在应对职业和环境中接触石棉对健康造成的后果,以及慢性且往往致命的石棉相关疾病(ARD)所带来的心理社会挑战。研究人员与利比地区居民进行了九个焦点小组访谈。对访谈记录进行分析,以探索家庭关于ARD的沟通模式。出现了以下五种模式:开放/支持型、沉默/支持型、开放/冲突型、沉默/冲突型和沉默/否认型。开放/支持型沟通包括鼓励进行ARD筛查、提供有关ARD及相关灾难主题的信息,以及对患有ARD的人的情感支持。相比之下,以沉默或冲突为特征的沟通模式有可能阻碍促进健康的沟通,并增加心理困扰。