School of Communication Studies, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(1-2):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9329-6.
Social support is an important resource for communities experiencing disasters. However, a disaster's nature (rapid- versus slow-onset, natural versus technological) may influence community-level responses. Disaster research on social support focuses primarily on rapid-onset natural disasters and, to a lesser extent, rapid-onset technological disasters. Little research has addressed slow-onset disasters. This study explores social support processes in Libby, MT, a community experiencing a "slow-motion technological disaster" due to widespread amphibole asbestos exposure. A comprehensive social support coding system was applied to focus-group and in-depth-interview transcripts. Results reveal that, although the community has a history of normative supportiveness during community and individual crises, that norm has been violated in the asbestos disaster context. Results are interpreted as a failure to achieve an "emergent altruistic community." Specifically, community-level conflict appears to interfere with previously established social support patterns. The observed phenomenon can be understood as the deterioration of a previously supportive community.
社会支持是受灾社区的重要资源。然而,灾难的性质(突发与缓发、自然与技术)可能会影响社区层面的反应。社会支持方面的灾难研究主要集中在突发自然灾难上,较少涉及突发技术灾难。很少有研究涉及缓发灾难。本研究探讨了蒙大拿州利比(Libby)社区的社会支持过程,该社区由于广泛的角闪石石棉暴露而经历了一场“慢动作技术灾难”。采用了全面的社会支持编码系统对焦点小组和深入访谈记录进行分析。研究结果表明,尽管该社区在社区和个人危机期间具有规范性支持的历史,但在石棉灾难背景下,这一规范已被违反。研究结果被解释为未能实现“突发利他社区”。具体而言,社区层面的冲突似乎干扰了之前建立的社会支持模式。观察到的现象可以理解为一个曾经支持性的社区的恶化。