• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决定高危颈动脉支架置入术围手术期及长期并发症的因素

Factors Determining Periprocedural and Long-term Complications of High Risk Carotid Artery Stenting.

作者信息

Dinculescu Vincent, Ritter Anne C M, dos Santos Marlise P, Mohan Ravi M, Schwarz Betty A, Lesiuk Howard J, Lum Cheemun

机构信息

1Faculty of Medicine.

5Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland,Dublin,Ireland.

出版信息

Can J Neurol Sci. 2015 Jan;42(1):48-54. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2014.125.

DOI:10.1017/cjn.2014.125
PMID:25635402
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been, historically, an alternative to open endarterectomy (CEA) for stroke prevention in high risk patients with carotid atherosclerosis. We sought to determine the rates of periprocedural and long-term stroke or death and the risk factors for complications after CAS in our high risk patient population.

METHODS

Clinical and treatment variables of consecutive CAS procedures performed between 2002 and 2011 were analyzed. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses we examined how patient characteristics influenced outcomes and changes in modified Rankin Score (mRS).

RESULTS

In 152 patients, the composite total of periprocedural death, stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) and myocardial infarction (MI) rate was 3.95% (6/152). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was strongly associated with periprocedural complications (p<0.001). Coronary artery disease/peripheral vascular disease (CAD/PVD) (p=0.03), dyslipidemia (p=0.02), CKD (p=0.01), and contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis (p=0.02) were non-modifiable risk factors for mRS increase. There were 25 deaths, 8 strokes, 11 TIAs, and 1 MI (mean follow-up 38.4 months, range 0-116 months). The presence of CAD/PVD (p=0.009) and dyslipidemia (p=0.002) were significantly associated with long-term complications.

CONCLUSION

CAS was performed with low periprocedural complications in high-risk patients. Our rates compare very favorably to large-scale trials that have ideal patients. This data encourages the consideration of CAS in patients considered high risk for CEA and provides possible patient characteristics (CKD) to help with periprocedural risk stratification.

摘要

背景与目的

从历史上看,对于患有颈动脉粥样硬化的高危患者,颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)一直是开放性颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)预防卒中的替代方法。我们试图确定在我们的高危患者群体中,CAS围手术期和长期卒中或死亡的发生率以及并发症的危险因素。

方法

分析了2002年至2011年间连续进行的CAS手术的临床和治疗变量。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,我们研究了患者特征如何影响结局以及改良Rankin评分(mRS)的变化。

结果

152例患者中,围手术期死亡、卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和心肌梗死(MI)的综合发生率为3.95%(6/152)。慢性肾脏病(CKD)与围手术期并发症密切相关(p<0.001)。冠状动脉疾病/外周血管疾病(CAD/PVD)(p=0.03)、血脂异常(p=0.02)、CKD(p=0.01)和对侧颈内动脉狭窄(p=0.02)是mRS升高的不可改变的危险因素。有25例死亡、8例卒中、11例TIA和1例MI(平均随访38.4个月,范围0-116个月)。CAD/PVD(p=0.009)和血脂异常(p=0.002)的存在与长期并发症显著相关。

结论

高危患者进行CAS时围手术期并发症发生率较低。我们的发生率与针对理想患者的大规模试验相比非常有利。这些数据鼓励考虑对被认为CEA高危的患者进行CAS,并提供可能有助于围手术期风险分层的患者特征(CKD)。

相似文献

1
Factors Determining Periprocedural and Long-term Complications of High Risk Carotid Artery Stenting.决定高危颈动脉支架置入术围手术期及长期并发症的因素
Can J Neurol Sci. 2015 Jan;42(1):48-54. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2014.125.
2
Remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke as the greatest risk in carotid‑stenting‑associated stroke and death: a single center's experience.远程术前缺血性卒中是颈动脉支架置入相关卒中和死亡的最大风险:单中心经验
Int Angiol. 2017 Aug;36(4):306-315. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.16.03737-8. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis.原发性颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术对比
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.051. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
4
Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy: meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术:随机试验的荟萃分析及多样性调整试验序贯分析
Arch Neurol. 2011 Feb;68(2):172-84. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.262. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
5
Comparison of carotid artery stenting in patients with single versus bilateral carotid artery disease and factors affecting midterm outcome.单侧与双侧颈动脉疾病患者的颈动脉支架置入术比较及影响中期预后的因素
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;25(6):796-804. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 May 6.
6
Anatomic variables contributing to a higher periprocedural incidence of stroke and TIA in carotid artery stenting: single center experience of 833 consecutive cases.解剖学变量与颈动脉支架置入术围手术期更高的卒中/TIA 发生率有关:833 例连续病例的单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):321-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23483. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
7
CAPTURE 2 risk-adjusted stroke outcome benchmarks for carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection.使用远端栓塞保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术的 CAPTURE 2 风险调整后的卒中结果基准。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):576-83, 583.e1-583.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.064. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
8
Carotid angioplasty and stenting, success relies on appropriate patient selection.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术,成功与否取决于合适的患者选择。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 May;47(5):946-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.049.
9
A prospective randomized trial comparing endarterectomy to stenting in severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis.一项比较严重无症状颈动脉狭窄患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的前瞻性随机试验。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Dec;58(6):814-817. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09513-6. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
10
The influence of contralateral occlusion on results of carotid interventions from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Registry.来自血管外科学会血管注册中心的对侧闭塞对颈动脉介入治疗结果的影响
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Oct;60(4):958-64; discussion 964-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.036.

引用本文的文献

1
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following transcarotid artery revascularization.利用机器学习预测经颈动脉血管重建术后的结果。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 31;15(1):3924. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81625-2.
2
Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes Following Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting.使用机器学习预测经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术后的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 3;13(17):e035425. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035425. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning.
使用机器学习预测颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的主要不良心血管事件。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e030508. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030508. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
4
Comorbidities and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Revascularization for Asymptomatic Critical Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Treated with Carotid Endarterectomy or Angioplasty with Stenting.无症状性重度颈内动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术或血管成形术加支架置入后伴发疾病及健康相关生活质量。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 26;25:4734-4743. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916407.