• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习预测颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的主要不良心血管事件。

Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning.

机构信息

Department of Surgery University of Toronto Canada.

Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto University of Toronto Canada.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e030508. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030508. Epub 2023 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.123.030508
PMID:37804197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10757546/
Abstract

Background Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a major vascular operation for stroke prevention that carries significant perioperative risks; however, outcome prediction tools remain limited. The authors developed machine learning algorithms to predict outcomes following CEA. Methods and Results The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular database was used to identify patients who underwent CEA between 2011 and 2021. Input features included 36 preoperative demographic/clinical variables. The primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death). The data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, 6 machine learning models were trained using preoperative features. The primary metric for evaluating model performance was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Model robustness was evaluated with calibration plot and Brier score. Overall, 38 853 patients underwent CEA during the study period. Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 1683 (4.3%) patients. The best performing prediction model was XGBoost, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90-0.92). In comparison, logistic regression had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.60-0.64), and existing tools in the literature demonstrate area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values ranging from 0.58 to 0.74. The calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with a Brier score of 0.02. The strongest predictive feature in our algorithm was carotid symptom status. Conclusions The machine learning models accurately predicted 30-day outcomes following CEA using preoperative data and performed better than existing tools. They have potential for important utility in guiding risk-mitigation strategies to improve outcomes for patients being considered for CEA.

摘要

背景

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是预防中风的主要血管手术,但围手术期风险较大;然而,预后预测工具仍然有限。作者开发了机器学习算法来预测 CEA 后的结果。

方法和结果

使用国家手术质量改进计划靶向血管数据库,确定 2011 年至 2021 年间接受 CEA 的患者。输入特征包括 36 项术前人口统计学/临床变量。主要结局为 30 天主要不良心血管事件(中风、心肌梗死或死亡的复合结局)。数据分为训练(70%)和测试(30%)集。使用 10 折交叉验证,使用术前特征训练 6 种机器学习模型。评估模型性能的主要指标是接收者操作特征曲线下面积。使用校准图和 Brier 评分评估模型的稳健性。

研究期间共有 38853 例患者接受了 CEA。30 天主要不良心血管事件发生在 1683 例(4.3%)患者中。表现最佳的预测模型是 XGBoost,其接收者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.91(95%置信区间,0.90-0.92)。相比之下,逻辑回归的接收者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.62(95%置信区间,0.60-0.64),文献中现有的工具显示的接收者操作特征曲线下面积值范围为 0.58 至 0.74。校准图显示预测和观察到的事件概率之间有较好的一致性,Brier 得分为 0.02。我们的算法中最强的预测特征是颈动脉症状状态。

结论

机器学习模型使用术前数据准确预测了 CEA 后的 30 天结局,其表现优于现有工具。它们有可能在指导风险缓解策略方面具有重要的实用价值,以改善考虑接受 CEA 的患者的结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e7a/10757546/7fbec59decf3/JAH3-12-e030508-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e7a/10757546/c0fd7945c08c/JAH3-12-e030508-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e7a/10757546/78c75f23a75b/JAH3-12-e030508-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e7a/10757546/7fbec59decf3/JAH3-12-e030508-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e7a/10757546/c0fd7945c08c/JAH3-12-e030508-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e7a/10757546/78c75f23a75b/JAH3-12-e030508-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e7a/10757546/7fbec59decf3/JAH3-12-e030508-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习预测颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的主要不良心血管事件。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e030508. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030508. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
2
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following carotid endarterectomy.使用机器学习预测颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Oct;78(4):973-987.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.024. Epub 2023 May 20.
3
Predicting outcomes following open revascularization for aortoiliac occlusive disease using machine learning.使用机器学习预测腹主动脉闭塞性疾病开放血运重建术后的结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Dec;78(6):1449-1460.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
4
Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes Following Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting.使用机器学习预测经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术后的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 3;13(17):e035425. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035425. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
5
Predicting Outcomes Following Lower Extremity Endovascular Revascularization Using Machine Learning.基于机器学习的下肢血管腔内血管重建术后结局预测。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e033194. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033194. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
6
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following suprainguinal bypass.使用机器学习预测腹股沟上旁路术后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):593-608.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.09.037. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
7
Predicting Outcomes Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using Machine Learning.基于机器学习预测腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后的结局。
Ann Surg. 2024 Mar 1;279(3):521-527. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005978. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
8
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.使用机器学习预测开放式腹主动脉瘤修复术后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Dec;78(6):1426-1438.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.08.121. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
9
Predicting outcomes following lower extremity open revascularization using machine learning.使用机器学习预测下肢开放性血管重建术后的结果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 5;14(1):2899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52944-1.
10
Machine-learning Models Predict 30-Day Mortality, Cardiovascular Complications, and Respiratory Complications After Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习模型预测无菌翻修全关节置换术后 30 天死亡率、心血管并发症和呼吸系统并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2137-2145. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002276. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Key Trends in Applying Artificial Intelligence to Health Technologies: A Scoping Review.探究将人工智能应用于健康技术的关键趋势:一项范围综述
PLoS One. 2025 May 15;20(5):e0322197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322197. eCollection 2025.
2
Predicting Major Preoperative Risk Factors for Retears After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Machine Learning Algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测关节镜下肩袖修复术后再撕裂的主要术前风险因素
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 9;14(6):1843. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061843.
3
Development, validation, and clinical evaluation of a machine-learning based model for diagnosing early infection after cardiovascular surgery (DEICS): a multi-center cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Pruning-based oversampling technique with smoothed bootstrap resampling for imbalanced clinical dataset of Covid-19.基于剪枝的过采样技术与平滑自助重采样用于新冠疫情不平衡临床数据集
J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. 2022 Oct;34(9):7830-7839. doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.09.021. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
Prediction of preoperative in-hospital mortality rate in patients with acute aortic dissection by machine learning: a two-centre, retrospective cohort study.基于机器学习的急性主动脉夹层患者术前院内死亡率预测:一项两中心回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 3;13(4):e066782. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066782.
3
XGBoost Machine Learning Algorithm for Prediction of Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
基于机器学习的心血管手术后早期感染诊断模型的开发、验证及临床评估(DEICS):一项多中心队列研究
Int J Surg. 2025 Apr 1;111(4):2862-2871. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002287.
4
Does machine learning improve prediction accuracy of the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score? A contemporary Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network cohort study.机器学习能否提高内镜下第三脑室造瘘术成功评分的预测准确性?一项当代脑积水临床研究网络队列研究。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Dec 10;41(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s00381-024-06667-3.
5
Validity of E-PASS Score for Evaluating Perioperative Minor Complications Associated with Carotid Endarterectomy.用于评估颈动脉内膜切除术围手术期轻微并发症的E-PASS评分的有效性
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2025 Jan 15;65(1):9-14. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0035. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
6
Prediction of cardiovascular events after carotid endarterectomy using pathological images and clinical data.利用病理图像和临床数据预测颈动脉内膜切除术后心血管事件
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025 Apr;20(4):643-652. doi: 10.1007/s11548-024-03286-w. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
7
One year outcomes following of carotid endarterectomy in different age groups: Russian multicenter study.不同年龄组颈动脉内膜切除术的一年期结果:俄罗斯多中心研究
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Nov;40(6):675-683. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01753-2. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
8
TCD-Guided management in carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective study.经颅多普勒超声引导下颈动脉内膜切除术的治疗管理:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 4;19(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03069-z.
9
Predicting Major Adverse Carotid Cerebrovascular Events in Patients with Carotid Stenosis: Integrating a Panel of Plasma Protein Biomarkers and Clinical Features-A Pilot Study.预测颈动脉狭窄患者的主要不良颈动脉脑血管事件:整合一组血浆蛋白生物标志物和临床特征——一项试点研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 9;13(12):3382. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123382.
10
Predicting Outcomes Following Lower Extremity Endovascular Revascularization Using Machine Learning.基于机器学习的下肢血管腔内血管重建术后结局预测。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e033194. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033194. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
用于预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后的XGBoost机器学习算法
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Mar 29;18:659-667. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S349956. eCollection 2022.
4
The use of Big Data Analytics in healthcare.大数据分析在医疗保健领域的应用。
J Big Data. 2022;9(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40537-021-00553-4. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
5
XGBoost, a Machine Learning Method, Predicts Neurological Recovery in Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.机器学习方法XGBoost可预测颈脊髓损伤患者的神经功能恢复情况。
Neurotrauma Rep. 2020 Jul 23;1(1):8-16. doi: 10.1089/neur.2020.0009. eCollection 2020.
6
Assessing the utility of deep neural networks in predicting postoperative surgical complications: a retrospective study.评估深度学习神经网络在预测术后手术并发症中的效用:一项回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Aug;3(8):e471-e485. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00084-4. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
7
Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease.血管外科学会颅外脑血管疾病管理临床实践指南
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1S):4S-22S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.073. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
8
Machine Learning and Surgical Outcomes Prediction: A Systematic Review.机器学习与外科手术结局预测:系统评价。
J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:346-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.045. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
9
Adoption of clinical risk prediction tools is limited by a lack of integration with electronic health records.临床风险预测工具的应用因缺乏与电子健康记录的整合而受到限制。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Feb;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100253.
10
Predicting adverse outcomes due to diabetes complications with machine learning using administrative health data.利用行政健康数据通过机器学习预测糖尿病并发症导致的不良后果。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Feb 12;4(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00394-8.