Hahn Paul, Chung Mina M, Flynn Harry W, Huang Suber S, Kim Judy E, Mahmoud Tamer H, Sadda Srinivas R, Dugel Pravin U
*Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; †Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; ‡Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; §Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; ¶Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; **Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and ††Retinal Consultants of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
Retina. 2015 Jun;35(6):1128-34. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000519.
After the recent approval of ocriplasmin by the Food and Drug Administration, postmarketing safety concerns have been raised by the vitreoretinal community. The American Society of Retina Specialists Therapeutic Surveillance Committee was commissioned to monitor postmarketing drug-related and device-related adverse events. The purpose of this report is to analyze the postmarketing safety experience in the context of available premarketing safety data.
Periodic aggregate safety reports consisting of premarketing, or clinical trial, data (n = 999 injections) and postmarketing reports through July 16, 2013 (n = 4,387 injections), were retrospectively analyzed by the TSC. The aggregate data were analyzed to classify adverse events, and the postmarketing safety data for each event type were compared with the premarketing data.
Eight categories of adverse events were identified. Acute reduction in visual acuity attributable to either worsening of macular pathology or development of subretinal fluid, electroretinogram changes, dyschromatopsia, retinal tears and detachments, lens subluxation or phacodonesis, impaired pupillary reflex, and retinal vessel findings were reported in both the premarketing and postmarketing experiences. Ellipsoid zone (inner segment/outer segment) findings were only reported in the postmarketing experience. Rates of postmarketing reports were lower than in the premarketing data. Adverse events were generally transient, and characteristics of these adverse events were generally similar between the premarketing and postmarketing experience.
Postmarket analyses are limited by significant underreporting, and in the case of ocriplasmin as a first in-class drug, they may not have captured safety events that have only more recently been identified. Nonetheless, postmarket analyses can identify the scope of potential safety events based on real-world experiences. Ocriplasmin administration should be guided by an appropriate and informed risk-benefit discussion with the patient. Ongoing active postmarket surveillance by all practitioners will continue to be critical to better understand this safety profile.
在食品药品监督管理局最近批准奥克纤溶酶后,玻璃体视网膜学界对其上市后安全性问题表示关注。美国视网膜专家协会治疗监测委员会受委托监测上市后与药物和器械相关的不良事件。本报告的目的是在现有上市前安全性数据的背景下分析上市后安全性经验。
治疗监测委员会对定期汇总的安全性报告进行回顾性分析,这些报告包括上市前或临床试验数据(999次注射)以及截至2013年7月16日的上市后报告(4387次注射)。对汇总数据进行分析以对不良事件进行分类,并将每种事件类型的上市后安全性数据与上市前数据进行比较。
确定了八类不良事件。上市前和上市后经验中均报告了因黄斑病变恶化或视网膜下液形成导致的视力急性下降、视网膜电图改变、色觉异常、视网膜裂孔和脱离、晶状体半脱位或晶状体震颤、瞳孔反射受损以及视网膜血管病变。椭球体带(内节/外节)病变仅在上市后经验中报告。上市后报告的发生率低于上市前数据。不良事件一般为短暂性,上市前和上市后经验中这些不良事件的特征通常相似。
上市后分析因报告严重不足而受到限制,对于奥克纤溶酶这种同类首创药物而言,可能未捕捉到最近才发现的安全事件。尽管如此,上市后分析可根据实际经验确定潜在安全事件的范围。奥克纤溶酶的给药应在与患者进行适当且充分知情的风险效益讨论后进行指导。所有从业者持续进行积极的上市后监测对于更好地了解这种安全性概况仍将至关重要。