Eto Ken, Omura Nobuo, Haruki Koichiro, Uno Yoshiko, Ohkuma Masahisa, Nakajima Shintaro, Anan Tadashi, Kosuge Makoto, Fujita Tetsuji, Yanaga Katsuhiko
Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb;25(1):e37-e41. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000059.
Advances in energy devices have played a major role in the rapid expansion of laparoscopic surgery. However, complications due to these energy devices are occasionally reported, and if the characteristics of these devices are not well understood, serious complications may occur. This study evaluated various typical energy devices and measured temperature rises in the adjacent tissue and in the devices themselves.
We used the following 7 types of energy devices: AutoSonix (AU), SonoSurg (SS), Harmonic Scalpel (HS), LigaSure Atlas (LA), LigaSure Dolphin Tip (LD), monopolar diathermy (Mono), and bipolar scissors (Bi). Laparoscopy was performed under general anesthesia in pigs, and the mesentery was dissected using each energy device. Tissue temperature at a distance of 1 mm from the energy device blade before and after dissection was measured. Temperature of the device blade both before and after dissection, time required for dissection, and interval until the temperature fell to 100°C, 75°C, and 50°C were documented.
Temperature of the surrounding tissue using each device rose the most with the Mono (50.5±8.0°C) and the least with the HS in full mode (6.2±0.7°C). Device temperature itself rose the highest with the AU in full mode (318.2±49.6°C), and the least with the Bi (61.9±4.8°C). All ultrasonic coagulation and cutting devices (AU, SS, and HS) had device temperatures increase up to ≥100°C, and even at 8 seconds after completing dissection, temperatures remained at ≥100°C.
Because the adjacent tissue temperature peaked with the Mono, cautious use near the intestine and blood vessels is necessary. In addition, the active blades of all ultrasonic coagulation and cutting devices, regardless of model, developed high temperatures exceeding 100°C. Therefore, an adequate cooling period after using these devices is therefore necessary between applications.
能量设备的进步在腹腔镜手术的迅速发展中发挥了重要作用。然而,偶尔会有因这些能量设备导致的并发症报道,如果对这些设备的特性了解不足,可能会发生严重并发症。本研究评估了各种典型的能量设备,并测量了相邻组织及设备本身的温度升高情况。
我们使用了以下7种能量设备:自动超声刀(AU)、超声外科手术系统(SS)、超声刀(HS)、血管闭合系统Atlas(LA)、血管闭合系统海豚头(LD)、单极电凝(Mono)和双极剪刀(Bi)。在猪全身麻醉下进行腹腔镜检查,使用每种能量设备解剖肠系膜。测量解剖前后距能量设备刀片1毫米处的组织温度。记录解剖前后设备刀片的温度、解剖所需时间以及温度降至100°C、75°C和50°C所需的间隔时间。
使用每种设备时,周围组织温度升高幅度最大的是Mono(50.5±8.0°C),全模式下HS升高幅度最小(6.2±0.7°C)。全模式下设备温度升高最高的是AU(318.2±49.6°C),Bi升高最少(61.9±4.8°C)。所有超声凝固切割设备(AU、SS和HS)的设备温度均升高至≥100°C,甚至在解剖完成8秒后,温度仍保持在≥100°C。
由于Mono使相邻组织温度达到峰值,因此在肠道和血管附近使用时需谨慎。此外,所有超声凝固切割设备的活动刀片,无论型号如何,都会产生超过100°C的高温。因此,使用这些设备后需要有足够的冷却时间间隔。