Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜右半结肠癌手术中使用的不同单极电切设备对手术结局的影响:endo-hook 与 endo-shears 的对比。

Surgical outcomes according to the type of monopolar electrocautery device used in laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a comparison of endo-hook versus endo-shears.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 463-707, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1070-1076. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06854-3. Epub 2019 May 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although monopolar electrocautery is preferred by many laparoscopic surgeons and is more cost-effective than bipolar or ultrasonic scissors, few studies have compared these outcomes between different monopolar electrocautery devices used in laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, this study compared the surgical outcomes between monopolar endo-hook versus endo-shears during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer.

METHODS

Using a prospective database of patients treated at our institute, we analyzed the surgical outcomes of 358 consecutive patients with right colon cancer who underwent curative laparoscopic surgery with a monopolar endo-hook (n = 164) or endo-shears (n = 194) between March 2009 and March 2017.

RESULTS

There were no differences in age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists' grade, previous operative history, or clinical stage between the endo-hook and endo-shears groups. The estimated blood loss was similar between the endo-hook and endo-shears groups (90.9 ± 60.3 vs. 92.0 ± 89.3 mL; P = 0.893). The number of harvested lymph nodes was greater in the endo-hook group (53.5 ± 20.3 vs. 48.1 ± 18.5; P = 0.008). Hospital stay was shorter in the endo-hook group (6.8 ± 2.2 vs. 7.8 ± 4.8 days; P = 0.013). Although chylous ascites was more frequent in the endo-hook group (21.3% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001), the postoperative morbidity rate was lower in this group (9.8% vs. 18.0%; P = 0.025). All instances of chylous ascites healed spontaneously without intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the use of a monopolar endo-hook during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy might permit more meticulous lymph-node dissection and reduce morbidity compared with the use of monopolar endo-shears. Therefore, we suggest that the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery might be associated with the type of electrocautery device used.

摘要

背景

尽管许多腹腔镜外科医生更喜欢使用单极电烙术,并且其比双极或超声剪刀更具成本效益,但很少有研究比较过腹腔镜手术中使用的不同单极电烙术设备之间的这些结果。因此,本研究比较了腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗右半结肠癌时使用单极endo-hook 与endo-shears 的手术结果。

方法

使用我们研究所治疗的患者的前瞻性数据库,我们分析了 2009 年 3 月至 2017 年 3 月期间接受单极 endo-hook(n=164)或 endo-shears(n=194)治疗的 358 例连续右半结肠癌患者的手术结果。

结果

endo-hook 组和 endo-shears 组在年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会分级、既往手术史或临床分期方面无差异。endo-hook 组和 endo-shears 组的估计失血量相似(90.9±60.3 与 92.0±89.3 ml;P=0.893)。endo-hook 组的淋巴结采集数量更多(53.5±20.3 与 48.1±18.5;P=0.008)。endo-hook 组的住院时间更短(6.8±2.2 与 7.8±4.8 天;P=0.013)。endo-hook 组的乳糜性腹水更为常见(21.3%与 7.7%,P<0.001),但该组的术后发病率较低(9.8%与 18.0%;P=0.025)。所有乳糜性腹水均未经干预而自发愈合。

结论

本研究表明,与使用单极 endo-shears 相比,腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中使用单极 endo-hook 可能允许更细致的淋巴结清扫并降低发病率。因此,我们建议腹腔镜手术的结果可能与使用的电烙术设备的类型有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验