• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学教育:关键原则。

Teaching clinical medicine: the key principals.

机构信息

From the Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel From the Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel

出版信息

QJM. 2015 Jun;108(6):435-42. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcv022. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcv022
PMID:25636345
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many studies analyse the diagnostic process, diagnostic errors and diagnostic excellence but few provide a broad, yet practical view of this complex and highly context-dependent challenge.

METHODS

A personal, experience- and research-based selection of the principles of data collection, processing and clinical reasoning found to be most useful in achieving an efficient, timely and patient-centered diagnosis.

RESULTS

Twenty-four principles were identified and each one is presented followed by a brief commentary.

CONCLUSIONS

No single strategy can provide a solution for all diagnostic problems. However, the 24 principles have proven validity and can be applied for solving diagnostic problems in varied settings and as a scaffold in teaching diagnosis at all levels of medical education.

摘要

背景

许多研究分析了诊断过程、诊断错误和诊断卓越,但很少有研究提供对这一复杂且高度依赖背景的挑战的广泛而实用的观点。

方法

根据个人经验和研究,选择了一些在实现高效、及时和以患者为中心的诊断方面最有用的数据收集、处理和临床推理原则。

结果

确定了 24 条原则,每条原则后面都附有简要的说明。

结论

没有单一的策略可以解决所有的诊断问题。然而,这 24 条原则已经被证明是有效的,可以应用于解决不同环境下的诊断问题,并作为医学教育各个层次教学诊断的支架。

相似文献

1
Teaching clinical medicine: the key principals.医学教育:关键原则。
QJM. 2015 Jun;108(6):435-42. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcv022. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
2
Twelve tips for teaching evidence-based physical examination.循证体格检查教学的十二条建议。
Med Teach. 2015;37(6):543-50. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.959908. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
3
The Assessment of Reasoning Tool (ART): structuring the conversation between teachers and learners.推理评估工具(ART):构建教师与学习者之间的对话
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Nov 27;5(4):197-203. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0052.
4
Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies.临床推理中的错误:原因与补救策略。
BMJ. 2009 Jun 8;338:b1860. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1860.
5
Twelve tips to improve bedside teaching.提高床边教学的十二条建议。
Med Teach. 2003 Mar;25(2):112-5. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000092463.
6
Identifying and training effective clinical teachers--new directions in clinical teacher training.识别与培养高效临床教师——临床教师培训的新方向
Aust Fam Physician. 2006 Jan-Feb;35(1-2):53-5.
7
On bedside teaching.论床边教学。
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 15;127(2):173. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-2-199707150-00045.
8
On bedside teaching.论床边教学。
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 15;127(2):172; author reply 173. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-2-199707150-00039.
9
Twelve tips for excellent physical examination teaching.优秀体格检查教学的十二条技巧
Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):851-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590802206747.
10
Validation of a scoring tool to select clinical vignettes.用于选择临床案例的评分工具的验证
Med Educ. 2013 May;47(5):530-1. doi: 10.1111/medu.12189.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive biases in orbital mass lesions - Lessons learned.眼眶肿块病变中的认知偏差——经验教训
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan-Mar;32(1):23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 12.