Suppr超能文献

连续头颅超声检查还是早期磁共振成像用于检测早产脑损伤?

Serial cranial ultrasonography or early MRI for detecting preterm brain injury?

作者信息

Plaisier Annemarie, Raets Marlou M A, Ecury-Goossen Ginette M, Govaert Paul, Feijen-Roon Monique, Reiss Irwin K M, Smit Liesbeth S, Lequin Maarten H, Dudink Jeroen

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Jul;100(4):F293-300. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306129. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate detection ability and feasibility of serial cranial ultrasonography (CUS) and early MRI in preterm brain injury.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level III neonatal intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

307 infants, born below 29 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

Serial CUS and MRI were performed according to standard clinical protocol. In case of instability, MRI was postponed or cancelled. Brain images were assessed by independent experts and compared between modalities.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Presence of preterm brain injury on either CUS or MRI and discrepant imaging findings on CUS and MRI.

RESULTS

Serial CUS was performed in all infants; early MRI was often postponed (n=59) or cancelled (n=126). Injury was found in 146 infants (47.6%). Clinical characteristics differed significantly between groups that were subdivided according to timing of MRI. 61 discrepant imaging findings were found. MRI was superior in identifying cerebellar haemorrhage; CUS in detection of acute intraventricular haemorrhage, perforator stroke and cerebral sinovenous thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced serial CUS seems highly effective in diagnosing preterm brain injury, but may miss cerebellar abnormalities. Although MRI does identify these lesions, feasibility is limited. Improved safety, better availability and tailored procedures are essential for MRI to increase its value in clinical care.

摘要

目的

探讨系列头颅超声检查(CUS)和早期磁共振成像(MRI)在早产儿脑损伤中的检测能力及可行性。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

三级新生儿重症监护病房。

研究对象

307例孕周小于29周的婴儿。

方法

按照标准临床方案进行系列CUS和MRI检查。若病情不稳定,则推迟或取消MRI检查。由独立专家对脑部图像进行评估,并对两种检查方式的结果进行比较。

主要观察指标

CUS或MRI检查发现的早产儿脑损伤情况,以及CUS和MRI检查结果不一致的情况。

结果

所有婴儿均接受了系列CUS检查;早期MRI检查常被推迟(n = 59)或取消(n = 126)。146例婴儿(47.6%)发现有脑损伤。根据MRI检查时间分组的各亚组间临床特征差异显著。发现61例检查结果不一致的情况。MRI在识别小脑出血方面更具优势;CUS在检测急性脑室内出血、穿支动脉卒中及脑静脉窦血栓形成方面更具优势。

结论

先进的系列CUS在诊断早产儿脑损伤方面似乎非常有效,但可能会遗漏小脑异常情况。虽然MRI能够识别这些病变,但其可行性有限。提高安全性、更好的可及性以及制定针对性的检查流程对于提高MRI在临床护理中的价值至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验