• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

啮齿动物对气味标记的反应:四个主要假说。

The response of rodents to scent marks: four broad hypotheses.

作者信息

Ferkin Michael H

机构信息

The University of Memphis, Department of Biological Sciences, Ellington Hall, 3700 Walker Ave, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.

出版信息

Horm Behav. 2015 Feb;68:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.10.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.10.002
PMID:25637402
Abstract

This article is part of a Special Issue "Chemosignals and Reproduction". Many terrestrial mammals must be able to distinguish between the myriad of scent marks they encounter in order for them to facilitate or deter direct interactions with their scent donors. I review studies that examine how rodents, mainly meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), respond when they encounter the scent marks of conspecifics and heterospecifics, and how context, as well as the age and condition of senders and receivers, affect their responses. The review uses four broad hypotheses to discuss the response of rodents to scent marks. The four hypotheses are as follows: 1) Scent marks convey accurate information to the receiver about the sender's state and phenotype and genotype. 2) Scent marks are individually distinct. 3) The response of receivers to scent marks is flexible and would be modulated by the cognitive abilities of receivers. 4) Receivers respond to the information contained or conveyed by the scent mark in a manner that will increase their survival and fitness. The studies cited in this review show that scent marks signal accurate information about the sender's phenotype, genotype, and condition, which receivers use to distinguish among the scent marks of different conspecifics and heterospecifics, and by doing so, receivers tailor their response accordingly to increase their survival and fitness. Thus, the four broad hypotheses may serve as guide to increase our understanding of the response of receivers to scent marks and provide a conceptual framework for future research and the development of additional hypotheses.

摘要

本文是《化学信号与繁殖》特刊的一部分。许多陆生哺乳动物必须能够区分它们遇到的无数气味标记,以便促进或阻止与气味标记提供者的直接互动。我回顾了一些研究,这些研究考察了啮齿动物,主要是草原田鼠(Microtus pennsylvanicus),在遇到同种和异种的气味标记时的反应,以及环境、发送者和接收者的年龄及状况如何影响它们的反应。该综述使用四个宽泛的假说来讨论啮齿动物对气味标记的反应。这四个假说如下:1)气味标记向接收者传达关于发送者的状态、表型和基因型的准确信息。2)气味标记具有个体独特性。3)接收者对气味标记的反应是灵活的,并且会受到接收者认知能力的调节。4)接收者以一种将提高其生存和适应性的方式对气味标记中包含或传达的信息做出反应。本综述中引用的研究表明,气味标记发出关于发送者表型、基因型和状况的准确信息,接收者利用这些信息来区分不同同种和异种的气味标记,并且通过这样做,接收者相应地调整其反应以提高生存和适应性。因此,这四个宽泛的假说可以作为一个指南,以增进我们对接收者对气味标记反应的理解,并为未来的研究和其他假说的发展提供一个概念框架。

相似文献

1
The response of rodents to scent marks: four broad hypotheses.啮齿动物对气味标记的反应:四个主要假说。
Horm Behav. 2015 Feb;68:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.10.002.
2
Scent marks of rodents can provide information to conspecifics.啮齿动物的气味标记可以向同种个体提供信息。
Anim Cogn. 2019 May;22(3):445-452. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01250-9. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
3
Female meadow voles, , do not alter their over-marking in response to female conspecifics that were food deprived.雌性草甸田鼠不会因食物匮乏的同种雌性个体而改变其过度标记行为。
Acta Ethol. 2014 Jun 1;17(2):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s10211-013-0161-5.
4
Self discrimination in meadow voles, .草甸田鼠的自我识别,. (你提供的原文似乎不完整,请补充完整以便更准确翻译。)
Ethology. 2008 Sep;114(9). doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01531.x.
5
Gonadal hormones modulate sex differences in judgments of relative numerousness in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus.性腺激素调节草甸田鼠(Microtus pennsylvanicus)在相对数量判断上的性别差异。
Horm Behav. 2009 Jan;55(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
6
Olfactory experience affects the response of meadow voles to the opposite-sex scent donor of mixed-sex over-marks.嗅觉体验会影响草甸田鼠对具有混合性别重叠标记的异性气味源的反应。
Ethology. 2010 Sep 1;116(9):821-831. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01795.x.
7
Female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, respond differently to the scent marks of multiple male conspecifics.雌性草甸田鼠(Microtus pennsylvanicus)对多个同种雄性个体的气味标记有不同反应。
Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):715-22. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0703-2. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
8
Age affects over-marking of opposite-sex scent marks in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus.年龄会影响草甸田鼠(Microtus pennsylvanicus)对异性气味标记的过度标记行为。
Ethology. 2010 Jan 1;116(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01711.x.
9
Effects of food availability on proceptivity: a test of the reproduction at all costs and metabolic fuels hypotheses.食物可获得性对求偶积极性的影响:对“不惜一切代价进行繁殖”假说和“代谢燃料”假说的一项检验。
Behav Processes. 2012 Oct;91(2):192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
10
Odor Communication and Mate Choice in Rodents.啮齿动物的气味交流与配偶选择
Biology (Basel). 2018 Jan 25;7(1):13. doi: 10.3390/biology7010013.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurobiology of Pathogen Avoidance and Mate Choice: Current and Future Directions.病原体回避与配偶选择的神经生物学:现状与未来方向
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jan 17;14(2):296. doi: 10.3390/ani14020296.
2
Female-Based Patterns and Social Function in Avian Chemical Communication.鸟类化学通讯中的基于雌性的模式和社会功能。
J Chem Ecol. 2021 Jan;47(1):43-62. doi: 10.1007/s10886-020-01230-1. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
3
Distinguishing between apparent and actual randomness: a preliminary examination with Australian ants.区分表面随机性和实际随机性:对澳大利亚蚂蚁的初步研究
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2018;72(7):113. doi: 10.1007/s00265-018-2527-1. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
4
Odor Communication and Mate Choice in Rodents.啮齿动物的气味交流与配偶选择
Biology (Basel). 2018 Jan 25;7(1):13. doi: 10.3390/biology7010013.
5
Deficiency of a brain-specific chemokine-like molecule, SAM3, induces cardinal phenotypes of autism spectrum disorders in mice.脑特异性趋化因子样分子 SAM3 的缺乏会导致小鼠自闭症谱系障碍的主要表型。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 28;7(1):16503. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16769-5.
6
Mesopredator behavioral response to olfactory signals of an apex predator.中层食肉动物对顶级食肉动物嗅觉信号的行为反应。
J Ethol. 2017;35(2):161-168. doi: 10.1007/s10164-016-0504-6. Epub 2017 Jan 10.