Moritz Bernd, Schnaible Volker, Kiessig Steffen, Heyne Andrea, Wild Markus, Finkler Christof, Christians Stefan, Mueller Kerstin, Zhang Li, Furuya Kenji, Hassel Marc, Hamm Melissa, Rustandi Richard, He Yan, Solano Oscar Salas, Whitmore Colin, Park Sung Ae, Hansen Dietmar, Santos Marcia, Lies Mark
F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacher Str. 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.
Paul-Ehrlich Institut, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 51-59, 63225 Langen, Germany.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2015 Mar 1;983-984:101-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.12.024. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
Within pharmaceutical industry charge heterogeneity testing of biopharmaceuticals has to be reproducible and fast. It should pass method validation according to ICH Q2. Classical approaches for the analysis of the charge heterogeneity of biopharmaceuticals are ion exchange chromatography (IEC) and isoelectric focusing (IEF). As an alternative approach, also capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) was expected to allow reliable charge heterogeneity profiling by separation according to the analyte's net charge and hydrodynamic radius. Aim of this study was to assess if CZE possesses all of the required features. Therefore, beside lab internal validation of this method also an international cross company study was organized. It was shown that CZE is applicable across a broad pI range between 7.4 and 9.5. The coefficient of correlation was above 0.99 which demonstrated linearity. Precision by repeatability was around 1% (maximum relative standard deviation per level) and accuracy by recovery was around 100% (mean recovery per level). Accuracy was further verified by direct comparison of IEC, IEF and CZE, which in this case showed comparable %CPA results for all three methods. However, best resolution for the investigated MAb was obtained with CZE. In dependence on sample concentration the detection limit was between 1 and 3%. Within the intercompany study for CZE the same stressed and non-stressed samples were analyzed in each of the 11 participating labs. The finally obtained dataset contained more than 1000 separations which provided an extended dataset for further statistical evaluation. Among the different labs no significant differences between the peak profiles were observed. Mean driver for dropouts in quantitative evaluation was linked to the performance of some participating labs while the impact of the method performance was negligible. In comparison to a 50cm capillary there was a slightly better separation of impurities and drug substance related compounds with a 30cm capillary which demonstrates that an increased stability indicating potential can be combined with the increased separation velocity and high throughput capability of a shorter capillary. Separation can be performed in as little as approx. 3min allowing high throughput applications. The intercompany study delivered precise results without explicit training of the participating labs in the method prior to the study (standard deviations in the range of 1%). It was demonstrated that CZE is an alternative platform technology for the charge heterogeneity testing of antibodies in the pharmaceutical industry.
在制药行业中,生物制药的电荷异质性检测必须具有可重复性且快速。它应通过根据国际人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)Q2进行的方法验证。分析生物制药电荷异质性的经典方法是离子交换色谱法(IEC)和等电聚焦法(IEF)。作为一种替代方法,毛细管区带电泳(CZE)也有望通过根据分析物的净电荷和流体动力学半径进行分离来实现可靠的电荷异质性分析。本研究的目的是评估CZE是否具备所有所需特性。因此,除了在实验室内部对该方法进行验证外,还组织了一项国际跨公司研究。结果表明,CZE适用于7.4至9.5的广泛pI范围。相关系数高于0.99,表明具有线性关系。重复性精密度约为1%(每个水平的最大相对标准偏差),回收率准确度约为100%(每个水平的平均回收率)。通过直接比较IEC、IEF和CZE进一步验证了准确度,在这种情况下,这三种方法的%CPA结果相当。然而,对于所研究的单克隆抗体,CZE获得了最佳分辨率。根据样品浓度,检测限在1%至3%之间。在CZE的跨公司研究中,11个参与实验室中的每一个都对相同的加标和未加标样品进行了分析。最终获得的数据集包含1000多次分离,为进一步的统计评估提供了扩展数据集。在不同实验室之间,未观察到峰形存在显著差异。定量评估中导致数据缺失的主要原因与一些参与实验室的性能有关,而方法性能的影响可忽略不计。与50cm毛细管相比,30cm毛细管对杂质和与药物相关的化合物的分离效果略好,这表明增加的稳定性潜力可以与更短毛细管的更高分离速度和高通量能力相结合。分离可在约3分钟内完成,适用于高通量应用。跨公司研究在研究前未对参与实验室进行该方法的明确培训的情况下就得出了精确结果(标准偏差在1%范围内)。结果表明,CZE是制药行业中用于抗体电荷异质性检测的一种替代平台技术。