• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力性尿失禁女性单切口与经闭孔由外向内中尿道吊带术的随机试验:12个月结果

Randomized trial of a single incision versus an outside-in transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 12 month results.

作者信息

Lee Joseph K-S, Rosamilia Anna, Dwyer Peter L, Lim Yik N, Muller Reinhold

机构信息

Department of Urogynecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; Pelvic Floor Clinic, Monash Medical Center, Moorabbin, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Pelvic Floor Clinic, Monash Medical Center, Moorabbin, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):35.e1-35.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.040. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.040
PMID:25637849
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate objective and subjective outcomes of MiniArc and Monarc (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN) midurethral sling (MUS) in women with stress incontinence at 12 months.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 225 women were randomized to receive MiniArc or Monarc. Women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency, previous MUS, or untreated detrusor overactivity were excluded. Objective cure was defined as negative cough stress test with a comfortably full bladder. Subjective cure was defined as no report of leakage with coughing or exercise on questionnaire. Validated questionnaires, together with urodynamic and clinical cough stress test, were used to evaluate the objective and subjective outcomes following surgery. Participants and clinicians were not masked to treatment allocation. Outcomes were compared with exact binomial tests (eg, Fisher exact test for dichotomous data) for categorical data and Student t tests or exact versions of Wilcoxon tests for numerical data as appropriate.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the subjective (92.2% vs 94.2%; P = .78; difference, 2.0%; 95% confidence interval, -2.7% to +6.7%) or objective (94.4% vs 96.7%; P = .50; difference, 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, -1.5% to +6.1%) cure rates between MiniArc and Monarc at 12 m, respectively, with a significant improvement in overactive bladder outcomes and incontinence impact from baseline in both arms.

CONCLUSION

MiniArc outcomes are not inferior to Monarc MUS outcomes at 12 months' follow-up in women without intrinsic sphincter deficiency.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估MiniArc和Monarc(美国美敦力公司,明尼通卡,明尼苏达州)两种经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术(MUS)治疗压力性尿失禁女性患者12个月时的客观和主观疗效。

研究设计

总共225名女性被随机分配接受MiniArc或Monarc治疗。排除存在固有括约肌缺陷、既往接受过MUS治疗或未治疗的逼尿肌过度活动的女性。客观治愈定义为膀胱适度充盈时咳嗽压力试验阴性。主观治愈定义为问卷调查中无咳嗽或运动时漏尿的报告。采用经过验证的问卷,结合尿动力学检查和临床咳嗽压力试验,评估术后的客观和主观疗效。参与者和临床医生未对治疗分配情况设盲。分类数据采用精确二项式检验(如二分数据的Fisher精确检验)进行结果比较,数值数据则根据情况采用Student t检验或Wilcoxon检验的精确版本进行比较。

结果

在12个月时,MiniArc和Monarc的主观治愈率(分别为92.2%和94.2%;P = 0.78;差异为2.0%;95%置信区间为-2.7%至+6.7%)或客观治愈率(分别为94.4%和96.7%;P = 0.50;差异为2.3%;95%置信区间为-1.5%至+6.1%)均无统计学显著差异,且两组患者的膀胱过度活动症结局和失禁影响较基线均有显著改善。

结论

在无固有括约肌缺陷的女性患者中,随访12个月时,MiniArc的疗效不劣于Monarc MUS的疗效。

相似文献

1
Randomized trial of a single incision versus an outside-in transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 12 month results.压力性尿失禁女性单切口与经闭孔由外向内中尿道吊带术的随机试验:12个月结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):35.e1-35.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.040. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
2
A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.经阴道单切口和经闭孔尿道中段吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照研究:12 个月随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
3
TVT Abbrevo and Miniarc suburethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence - A randomised controlled trial.TVT Abbrevo和Miniarc耻骨后尿道悬吊术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Nov;230:141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.09.032. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
A randomized, nonblinded extension study of single-incision versus transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.一项针对压力性尿失禁女性的单切口与经闭孔中尿道吊带术的随机、非盲法扩展研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3362-z. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
5
A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.压力性尿失禁女性单切口与传统经闭孔尿道中段吊带术的随机对照研究:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):871-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2898-z. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
6
Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following surgical anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs Miniarc).手术抗尿失禁手术(Monarc与Miniarc)后的超声检查及临床结果
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
7
Single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings.单切口迷你吊带与经闭孔吊带:MiniArc和Monarc吊带的比较研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jul;21(7):773-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1127-z. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
8
Five-year follow-up study of Monarc transobturator tape for surgical treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence.用于手术治疗原发性压力性尿失禁的Monarc经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带的五年随访研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Nov;27(11):1653-1659. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3019-3. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
9
Three-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency.经阴道无张力吊带术与经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁伴固有括约肌缺陷患者的 3 年随访结果比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):321-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823dfc73.
10
A multi-centre, randomised clinical control trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach versus the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free, suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study.一项多中心随机临床对照试验,比较耻骨后(RP)入路与经闭孔入路(TO)用于无张力尿道下吊带治疗尿动力学压力性尿失禁:TORP研究。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Feb;19(2):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0412-y. Epub 2007 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Instruments Used for the Assessment of SUI Severity in Urogynecologic Surgical Trials: A Scoping Review.用于妇科泌尿外科学手术试验中压力性尿失禁严重程度评估的器械:一项范围综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Dec;35(12):2255-2279. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05934-w. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
2
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.经阴道单切口吊带术治疗女性尿失禁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.
3
Single Incision Mini-Sling Versus Mid-Urethral Sling (Transobturator/Retropubic) in Females With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
单切口迷你吊带术与女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带术(经闭孔/耻骨后)对比:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 Apr 18;15(4):e37773. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37773. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Ambulatory MiniArc Precise Sling under Local Anesthesia for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Feasibility and Outcome.局部麻醉下门诊MiniArc精准吊带治疗压力性尿失禁:可行性与疗效
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2019 Aug 29;8(3):113-117. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_104_18. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep.
5
Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.女性压力性尿失禁的外科治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;40(8):477-490. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667184. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator mid-urethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.单切口迷你吊带(MiniArc)与经闭孔中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(14):e0283. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010283.
7
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
8
A randomized, nonblinded extension study of single-incision versus transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.一项针对压力性尿失禁女性的单切口与经闭孔中尿道吊带术的随机、非盲法扩展研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3362-z. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
9
Outpatient mid-urethral tissue fixation system sling for urodynamic stress urinary incontinence: 3-year surgical and quality of life results.门诊使用的用于治疗尿动力学压力性尿失禁的中段尿道组织固定系统吊带:3年手术及生活质量结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1733-1738. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3341-4. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Contasure-needleless® compared with Monarc® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.Contasure无针®与Monarc®治疗压力性尿失禁的比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jul;28(7):1077-1084. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3231-1. Epub 2016 Dec 26.