Suppr超能文献

将REACH得出的工人无效应水平与欧盟指示性职业接触限值以及芬兰的国家限值进行比较。

A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.

作者信息

Tynkkynen Sallamari, Santonen Tiina, Stockmann-Juvala Helene

机构信息

Work Environment Development, Chemical Safety, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 a A, FI-00250 Helsinki, Finland.

Work Environment Development, Chemical Safety, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 a A, FI-00250 Helsinki, Finland

出版信息

Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 May;59(4):401-15. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu112. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

Abstract

The purpose of occupational exposure limits values (OELs) is to regulate exposure to chemicals and minimize the risk of health effects at work. National authorities are responsible for the setting and updating of national OELs. In addition, the EU sets indicative occupational exposure limit values (IOELVs), which have to be considered by the Member States. Under the new European legislation on chemicals (REACH), manufacturers and importers are obliged to establish derived no-effect levels (DNELs) for chemicals that are manufactured or imported in quantities >10 tonnes per year. Chemical safety data sheets must report both OELs and the DNEL values, if such have been set. This may cause confusion at workplaces, especially if the values differ from each other. In this study, we explored how EU IOELVs and Finnish national OELs [Haitallisiksi tunnetut pitoisuudet (HTP) values] correlate with worker inhalation DNELs for substances registered under REACH. The long-term DNEL value for workers (inhalation) was identical to the corresponding IOELV for the majority of the substances (64/87 cases). Comparison of DNELs with HTP values revealed that the values were identical or close to each other in 159 cases (49%), whereas the DNEL was considerably higher in 69 cases, and considerably lower in 87 cases. Examples of cases with high differences between Finnish national OELs and DNELs are given. However, as the DNELs were not systematically lower than the OELs, the default assessment factors suggested by REACH technical guidance had obviously not been used in many of the REACH registrations.

摘要

职业接触限值(OELs)的目的是规范化学物质的接触,并将工作场所健康影响的风险降至最低。国家当局负责设定和更新国家OELs。此外,欧盟设定了指示性职业接触限值(IOELVs),成员国必须予以考虑。根据欧洲新的化学品法规(REACH),制造商和进口商有义务为每年生产或进口量超过10吨的化学品确定导出无效应水平(DNELs)。化学品安全数据表必须报告OELs和已设定的DNEL值(如果已设定)。这可能会在工作场所造成混乱,尤其是当这些值彼此不同时。在本研究中,我们探讨了欧盟IOELVs和芬兰国家OELs[以ppm表示的浓度值(HTP)值]与REACH法规下注册物质的工人吸入DNELs之间的相关性。大多数物质(64/87例)的工人长期DNEL值(吸入)与相应的IOELV相同。将DNELs与HTP值进行比较发现,在159例(49%)中,这些值相同或接近,而在69例中DNEL值明显更高,在87例中明显更低。给出了芬兰国家OELs与DNELs差异较大的案例示例。然而,由于DNELs并非系统性地低于OELs,REACH技术指南建议的默认评估因子显然在许多REACH注册中未被使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验