• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

浸润模式是接受淋巴结清扫且病理检查无淋巴结转移的阴茎癌患者最重要的预后因素。

Pattern of invasion is the most important prognostic factor in patients with penile cancer submitted to lymph node dissection and pathological absence of lymph node metastasis.

作者信息

Aita Giuliano, da Costa Walter Henriques, de Cassio Zequi Stenio, da Cunha Isabela Werneck, Soares Fernando, Guimaraes Gustavo Cardoso, Lopes Ademar

机构信息

Urology Division, A.C. Camargo Cancer Centre, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116(4):584-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13071. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1111/bju.13071
PMID:25639616
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify prognostic factors in a cohort of patients with penile carcinoma with pathological absence of lymph node metastasis (pN0), as penile carcinoma is a rare neoplasm in European countries, in which the presence of lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor but few studies have examined patients with penile carcinoma with histologically negative nodes (pN0).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of patients with penile carcinoma, 101 met the inclusion criteria; 47 (46.5%) underwent bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) and 54 (53.5%) underwent bilateral inguinopelvic LND. Variables that had a prognostic impact on survival rates in univariate analysis were selected for multivariate survival analysis.

RESULTS

The cohorts cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 88.1% and 52.5%, respectively. Histological grade and pattern of invasion were the only features to significantly impact survival rates in the univariate analysis. The CSS and OS rates in patients with 'pushing' vs 'infiltrating' patterns of invasion were 98.0% vs 78.4% (P = 0.003) and 70.0% vs 35.3% (P = 0.005), respectively. Pattern of invasion was the only independent predictor of survival. Patients with infiltrating invasion had a higher probability of death from cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 11.5, P = 0.019) and overall death (HR 2.3, P = 0.007) compared with those with a pushing invasion pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of an infiltrating pattern of invasion is the most important predictor of survival in patients with penile carcinoma. We encourage other centres to confirm our findings that the pattern of invasion is an important prognostic factor in patients with penile carcinoma and pN0 disease.

摘要

目的

在一组病理检查无淋巴结转移(pN0)的阴茎癌患者中确定预后因素,因为阴茎癌在欧洲国家是一种罕见肿瘤,其中淋巴结转移的存在是最重要的预后因素,但很少有研究针对组织学检查淋巴结阴性(pN0)的阴茎癌患者进行研究。

患者与方法

阴茎癌患者中,101例符合纳入标准;47例(46.5%)接受双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(LND),54例(53.5%)接受双侧腹股沟盆腔LND。在单因素分析中对生存率有预后影响的变量被选入多因素生存分析。

结果

该队列的癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)分别为88.1%和52.5%。组织学分级和浸润模式是单因素分析中显著影响生存率的唯一特征。“推挤式”与“浸润式”浸润模式患者的CSS和OS率分别为98.0%对78.4%(P = 0.003)和70.0%对35.3%(P = 0.005)。浸润模式是生存的唯一独立预测因素。与推挤式浸润模式患者相比,浸润式浸润模式患者死于癌症的概率更高(风险比[HR] 11.5,P = 0.019),总体死亡概率更高(HR 2.3,P = 0.007)。

结论

浸润式浸润模式的存在是阴茎癌患者生存的最重要预测因素。我们鼓励其他中心证实我们的发现,即浸润模式是阴茎癌和pN0疾病患者的重要预后因素。

相似文献

1
Pattern of invasion is the most important prognostic factor in patients with penile cancer submitted to lymph node dissection and pathological absence of lymph node metastasis.浸润模式是接受淋巴结清扫且病理检查无淋巴结转移的阴茎癌患者最重要的预后因素。
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116(4):584-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13071. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
2
Prognostic factors in patients with penile carcinoma and inguinal lymph node metastasis.阴茎癌伴腹股沟淋巴结转移患者的预后因素
Int J Urol. 2015 Jul;22(7):669-73. doi: 10.1111/iju.12759. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
3
Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗具有淋巴结侵犯高风险的阴茎癌的长期随访。
J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.025.
4
Prospectively packaged ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the disseminative pattern of lymph node metastasis.阴茎癌的前瞻性包装髂腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:淋巴结转移的播散模式
J Urol. 2009 May;181(5):2103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.041. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
5
Disease-specific survival after radical lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: prediction by lymph node count and density.阴茎癌根治性淋巴结清扫术后的疾病特异性生存率:通过淋巴结计数和密度进行预测
Urol Oncol. 2014 Aug;32(6):893-900. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.11.008. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
Front pattern of invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: new prognostic factor for predicting risk of lymph node metastases.阴茎鳞状细胞癌的前部浸润模式:预测淋巴结转移风险的新预后因素。
Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.050.
7
p53 as a new prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis in penile carcinoma: analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy.p53作为阴茎癌淋巴结转移的新预后因素:82例行截肢术和双侧淋巴结清扫术患者的分析
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):81-6.
8
Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in pelvic node-positive penile cancer after lymph node dissection: a multi-institutional study.辅助化疗与盆腔淋巴结阳性阴茎癌淋巴结清扫术后总生存期的改善相关:一项多机构研究。
Urol Oncol. 2015 Nov;33(11):496.e17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Establishing Criteria for Bilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in the Management of Penile Cancer: Lessons Learned from an International Multicenter Collaboration.建立阴茎癌管理中双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫的标准:来自国际多中心合作的经验教训。
J Urol. 2015 Sep;194(3):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.090. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in patients with pathological node positive penile carcinoma.病理性淋巴结阳性阴茎癌患者的结外侵犯对预后的影响。
J Urol. 2010 Oct;184(4):1347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.016. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of PeIN at the surgical margin: insights from an organ-sparing penile cancer database.手术切缘处阴茎上皮内瘤变的转归:来自保留器官的阴茎癌数据库的见解
World J Urol. 2025 Jun 6;43(1):360. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05731-0.
2
Predictive histopathological factors of nodal metastasis in penile cancer.阴茎癌淋巴结转移的预测性组织病理学因素。
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Sep-Oct;49(5):628-636. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0640.
3
Increased HRD score in cisplatin resistant penile cancer cells.顺铂耐药性阴茎癌细胞中 HRD 评分增加。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 23;22(1):1352. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10432-7.
4
The peri- and intratumoral immune cell infiltrate and PD-L1 status in invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the penis.阴茎浸润性鳞状细胞癌的瘤周和瘤内免疫细胞浸润和 PD-L1 状态。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2022 Feb;24(2):331-341. doi: 10.1007/s12094-021-02694-7. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
5
Perinerural, lymphovascular and depths of invasion in extrapolating nodal metastasis in oral cancer.神经周围、脉管和侵犯深度在口腔癌淋巴结转移预测中的作用。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Feb;24(2):747-755. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02921-0. Epub 2019 May 28.
6
Prognostic factors in patients with penile cancer after surgical management.阴茎癌患者手术后的预后因素。
World J Urol. 2018 Mar;36(3):435-440. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2167-5. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
7
Differences in Survival Associated with Performance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Penile Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.生存差异与浸润性阴茎癌患者淋巴结清扫术的相关性:来自国家癌症数据库的研究结果。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1238-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.121. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
8
Surveillance strategies in the management of penile cancer.阴茎癌管理中的监测策略
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Oct;6(5):868-873. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.06.04.
9
Tumor histologic grade is the most important prognostic factor in patients with penile cancer and clinically negative lymph nodes not submitted to regional lymphadenectomy.肿瘤组织学分级是阴茎癌患者且临床淋巴结阴性未接受区域淋巴结清扫术患者最重要的预后因素。
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Nov-Dec;42(6):1136-1143. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0416.