Suppr超能文献

使用非侵入性方法诊断急性肠胃炎患儿的临床显著脱水:一项荟萃分析。

Diagnosing clinically significant dehydration in children with acute gastroenteritis using noninvasive methods: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Sections of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Gastroenterology, Alberta Children's Hospital, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2015 Apr;166(4):908-16.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.029. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the most accurate, noninvasive method of assessing dehydration.

STUDY DESIGN

The following data sources were searched: electronic databases, gray literature, scientific meetings, reference lists, and authors of unpublished studies. Eligible studies were comparative outpatient evaluations that used an accepted reference standard and were conducted in developed countries in children aged <18 years with gastroenteritis. Data extraction was completed independently by multiple reviewers before a consensus was made.

RESULTS

Nine studies that included 1039 participants were identified. The 4-item Clinical Dehydration Scale (CDS), the "Gorelick" score, and unstructured physician assessment were evaluated in 3, 2, and 5 studies, respectively. Bedside ultrasound, capillary digital videography, and urinary measurements were each evaluated in one study. The CDS had a positive likelihood ratio (LR) range of 1.87-11.79 and a negative LR range of 0.30-0.71 to predict 6% dehydration. When combined with the 4-item Gorelick Score, the positive LR was 1.93 (95% CI 1.07-3.49) and negative LR was of 0.40 (95% CI 0.24-0.68). Unstructured dehydration assessment had a pooled positive LR of 2.13 (95% CI 1.33-3.44) and negative LR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.28-0.82) to detect ≥ 5% dehydration.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the clinical scales evaluated provide some improved diagnostic accuracy. However, test characteristics indicate that their ability to identify children both with and without dehydration is suboptimal. Current evidence does not support the routine use of ultrasound or urinalysis to determine dehydration severity.

摘要

目的

确定评估脱水最准确、无创的方法。

研究设计

检索了以下数据源:电子数据库、灰色文献、科学会议、参考文献列表以及未发表研究的作者。合格的研究是对门诊患者进行的比较评估,使用了公认的参考标准,并在发达国家进行,对象是年龄<18 岁的患有肠胃炎的儿童。多位评审员独立完成数据提取,然后达成共识。

结果

确定了 9 项研究,共纳入 1039 名参与者。分别有 3、2 和 5 项研究评估了 4 项临床脱水量表(CDS)、“Gorelick”评分和非结构化医师评估。床边超声、毛细血管数字视频摄影和尿液测量分别在 1 项研究中进行了评估。CDS 的阳性似然比(LR)范围为 1.87-11.79,阴性 LR 范围为 0.30-0.71,用于预测 6%脱水。当与 4 项 Gorelick 评分相结合时,阳性 LR 为 1.93(95%可信区间 1.07-3.49),阴性 LR 为 0.40(95%可信区间 0.24-0.68)。非结构化脱水评估的汇总阳性 LR 为 2.13(95%可信区间 1.33-3.44),阴性 LR 为 0.48(95%可信区间 0.28-0.82),以检测≥5%的脱水。

结论

总体而言,评估的临床量表提供了一些改进的诊断准确性。然而,测试特征表明,它们识别有脱水和无脱水儿童的能力并不理想。目前的证据不支持常规使用超声或尿液分析来确定脱水的严重程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验