National Skin Centre, 1 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308205, Singapore.
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Jun;172(6):1535-1540. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13699. Epub 2015 May 12.
Objective outcome measures for melasma severity are essential for the evaluation of severity as well as results of treatment. The modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) score is a validated tool for assessing melasma severity but is often subject to inter-observer variability.
To develop and validate a novel image analysis software designed to automatically calculate the area and degree of hyperpigmentation in melasma from computer image analysis of whole-face digital photographs, thereby deriving an automated mMASI score (aMASI).
The algorithm was developed in collaboration between dermatologists and image analysis experts. Firstly, using an adaptive threshold method, the algorithm identifies, segments and calculates the areas involved. It then calculates the darkness. Finally, the derived area and darkness are then used to calculate mMASI. The scores derived from the algorithm are validated prospectively. Twenty-nine patients with melasma using depigmenting agents were recruited for validation. Three dermatologists scored mMASI at baseline and post-treatment using standardized photographs. These scores were compared with aMASI scores derived from computer analysis.
aMASI scores correlated well with clinical mMASI pre-treatment (r = 0·735, P < 0·001) and post-treatment (r = 0·608, P < 0·001). aMASI was reliable in detecting changes with treatment. These changes in aMASI scores correlated well with changes in clinician-assessed mMASI (r = 0·622, P < 0·001).
This study proposes a novel approach in melasma scoring using digital image analysis. It holds promise as a tool that would enable clinicians worldwide to standardize melasma severity scoring and outcome measures in an easy and reproducible manner, enabling different treatment options to be compared accurately.
客观的黄褐斑严重程度评估指标对于评估严重程度和治疗结果至关重要。改良的黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(mMASI)评分是评估黄褐斑严重程度的一种经过验证的工具,但往往存在观察者间的变异性。
开发和验证一种新的图像分析软件,该软件旨在通过对面部全数字照片的计算机图像分析,自动计算黄褐斑的面积和色素沉着程度,从而得出自动的 mMASI 评分(aMASI)。
该算法由皮肤科医生和图像分析专家合作开发。首先,该算法使用自适应阈值方法识别、分割和计算所涉及的区域。然后计算其暗度。最后,根据所得到的面积和暗度计算出 mMASI。该算法得出的分数进行了前瞻性验证。招募了 29 名正在使用脱色剂治疗的黄褐斑患者进行验证。三位皮肤科医生使用标准化照片在基线和治疗后对 mMASI 进行评分。这些分数与计算机分析得出的 aMASI 分数进行了比较。
aMASI 评分与临床 mMASI 治疗前(r=0.735,P<0.001)和治疗后(r=0.608,P<0.001)有很好的相关性。aMASI 能可靠地检测到治疗后的变化。这些 aMASI 评分的变化与临床医生评估的 mMASI 变化密切相关(r=0.622,P<0.001)。
本研究提出了一种使用数字图像分析进行黄褐斑评分的新方法。它有望成为一种工具,使全球的临床医生能够以简单、可重复的方式标准化黄褐斑严重程度评分和疗效评估,从而准确比较不同的治疗方案。