Suppr超能文献

门诊心力衰竭患者左心室辅助装置与药物治疗的风险评估及比较效果:ROADMAP临床试验的设计与原理

Risk assessment and comparative effectiveness of left ventricular assist device and medical management in ambulatory heart failure patients: design and rationale of the ROADMAP clinical trial.

作者信息

Rogers Joseph G, Boyle Andrew J, O'Connell John B, Horstmanshof Douglas A, Haas Donald C, Slaughter Mark S, Park Soon J, Farrar David J, Starling Randall C

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2015 Feb;169(2):205-210.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanical circulatory support is now a proven therapy for the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock. The role for this therapy in patients with less severe heart failure is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to examine the impact of mechanically assisted circulation using the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device in patients who meet current US Food and Drug Administration-defined criteria for treatment but are not yet receiving intravenous inotropic therapy.

METHODS

This is a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial of 200 patients treated with either optimal medical management or a mechanical circulatory support device.

CLINICAL CONTEXT

This trial will be the first prospective clinical evaluation comparing outcomes of patients with advanced ambulatory heart failure treated with either ongoing medical therapy or a left ventricular assist device. It is anticipated to provide novel insights regarding relative outcomes with each treatment and an understanding of patient and provider acceptance of the ventricular assist device therapy. This trial will also provide information regarding the risk of events in "stable" patients with advanced heart failure and guidance for the optimal timing of left ventricular assist device therapy.

摘要

背景

机械循环支持现已成为治疗晚期心力衰竭和心源性休克患者的一种经证实的疗法。该疗法在病情较轻的心力衰竭患者中的作用尚不清楚。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置进行机械辅助循环对符合美国食品药品监督管理局当前定义的治疗标准但尚未接受静脉注射正性肌力药物治疗的患者的影响。

方法

这是一项对200例患者进行的前瞻性、非随机临床试验,这些患者接受了最佳药物治疗或机械循环支持装置治疗。

临床背景

该试验将是第一项前瞻性临床评估,比较接受持续药物治疗或左心室辅助装置治疗的晚期非卧床心力衰竭患者的结局。预计该试验将提供有关每种治疗相对结局的新见解,并了解患者和医疗服务提供者对心室辅助装置治疗的接受情况。该试验还将提供有关“稳定”的晚期心力衰竭患者发生事件风险的信息,以及左心室辅助装置治疗最佳时机的指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验