Suppr超能文献

在门诊心力衰竭患者中左心室辅助装置和药物治疗的风险评估和比较效果:ROADMAP 研究 2 年结果。

Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results.

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;5(7):518-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to provide the pre-specified primary endpoint of the ROADMAP (Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients) trial at 2 years.

BACKGROUND

The ROADMAP trial was a prospective nonrandomized observational study of 200 patients (97 with a left ventricular assist device [LVAD], 103 on optimal medical management [OMM]) that showed that survival with improved functional status at 1 year was better with LVADs compared with OMM in a patient population of ambulatory New York Heart Association functional class IIIb/IV patients.

METHODS

The primary composite endpoint was survival on original therapy with improvement in 6-min walk distance ≥75 m.

RESULTS

Patients receiving LVAD versus OMM had lower baseline health-related quality of life, reduced Seattle Heart Failure Model 1-year survival (78% vs. 84%; p = 0.012), and were predominantly INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) profile 4 (65% vs. 34%; p < 0.001) versus profiles 5 to 7. More LVAD patients met the primary endpoint at 2 years: 30% LVAD versus 12% OMM (odds ratio: 3.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 7.7]; p = 0.012). Survival as treated on original therapy at 2 years was greater for LVAD versus OMM (70 ± 5% vs. 41 ± 5%; p < 0.001), but there was no difference in intent-to-treat survival (70 ± 5% vs. 63 ± 5%; p = 0.307). In the OMM arm, 23 of 103 (22%) received delayed LVADs (18 within 12 months; 5 from 12 to 24 months). LVAD adverse events declined after year 1 for bleeding (primarily gastrointestinal) and arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival on original therapy with improvement in 6-min walk distance was superior with LVAD compared with OMM at 2 years. Reduction in key adverse events beyond 1 year was observed in the LVAD group. The ROADMAP trial provides risk-benefit information to guide patient- and physician-shared decision making for elective LVAD therapy as a treatment for heart failure. (Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients [ROADMAP]; NCT01452802).

摘要

目的

作者旨在报告 ROADMAP 试验的预先指定的主要终点,该试验的随访时间为 2 年。

背景

ROADMAP 试验是一项前瞻性非随机观察性研究,共纳入 200 例患者(97 例接受左心室辅助装置[LVAD]治疗,103 例接受最佳药物治疗[OMM])。结果显示,与 OMM 相比,LVAD 治疗可使 1 年时功能状态改善且存活的患者数量更多,该研究患者人群为 NYHA 心功能 IIIb/IV 级的门诊心力衰竭患者。

方法

主要复合终点为在原始治疗下存活,且 6 分钟步行距离改善≥75 m。

结果

与 OMM 组相比,LVAD 组患者的基线健康相关生活质量更低,西雅图心力衰竭模型 1 年生存率更低(78% vs. 84%;p=0.012),且 INTERMACS 分级主要为 4 级(65% vs. 34%;p<0.001)而非 5 级或 7 级。更多的 LVAD 患者在 2 年时达到了主要终点:LVAD 组为 30%,而 OMM 组为 12%(比值比:3.2[95%置信区间:1.3 至 7.7];p=0.012)。2 年时,LVAD 组患者按原治疗方案存活的比例高于 OMM 组(70±5% vs. 41±5%;p<0.001),但意向治疗生存率无差异(70±5% vs. 63±5%;p=0.307)。在 OMM 组中,103 例患者中有 23 例(22%)接受了延迟性 LVAD 治疗(18 例在 12 个月内,5 例在 12 至 24 个月内)。LVAD 相关不良事件在 1 年后出血(主要是胃肠道)和心律失常方面有所减少。

结论

与 OMM 相比,LVAD 治疗在 2 年时可提高患者在原始治疗下的存活率和 6 分钟步行距离改善率。LVAD 组在 1 年后观察到关键不良事件减少。ROADMAP 试验为患者和医生共同决策提供了风险效益信息,以指导选择 LVAD 作为心力衰竭的治疗方法。(风险评估和比较左心室辅助装置和医疗管理在门诊心力衰竭患者中的效果[ROADMAP];NCT01452802)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验