• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[机器崛起?用于治疗严重心力衰竭的左心室辅助装置]

[Rise of the machines? Left ventricular assist devices for treatment of severe heart failure].

作者信息

Ujeyl A, Krüger M

机构信息

Abteilung für Kardiologie, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstraße 5, 20099, Hamburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Herz. 2015 Nov;40(7):972-9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-015-4365-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00059-015-4365-5
PMID:26530283
Abstract

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) as a treatment for severe heart failure has gained momentum in recent years. Even at this stage the number of worldwide LVAD implantations far exceeds the volume of heart transplantations in view of the chronic shortage of donor organs. Third generation continuous flow assist devices have helped to improve survival, quality of life and symptom burden of heart failure patients in comparison to a regimen of optimal medication management. Alongside bridging to transplantation, destination therapy has become an established strategy of LVAD implantation. A careful patient selection process is crucial for a good clinical outcome after device implantation and risk assessment for postoperative right ventricular failure is of particular importance in this context. The rate of hospitalization during LVAD support is still high, despite the step-wise attempts to widen the indications to less severely ill heart failure patients. An effective perioperative and postoperative management will help to lower the incidence of complications (e.g. bleeding, infections, thromboembolic events and right ventricular failure) and to improve the encouraging results of mechanical circulatory support.

摘要

近年来,使用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗严重心力衰竭的情况日益普遍。即便在现阶段,鉴于供体器官长期短缺,全球LVAD植入数量远远超过心脏移植数量。与最佳药物治疗方案相比,第三代连续血流辅助装置有助于提高心力衰竭患者的生存率、生活质量并减轻症状负担。除了过渡到移植,目标治疗已成为LVAD植入的既定策略。精心的患者选择过程对于装置植入后的良好临床结果至关重要,在此背景下,术后右心室衰竭的风险评估尤为重要。尽管逐步尝试扩大适应证至病情较轻的心力衰竭患者,但LVAD支持期间的住院率仍然很高。有效的围手术期和术后管理将有助于降低并发症(如出血、感染、血栓栓塞事件和右心室衰竭)的发生率,并改善机械循环支持令人鼓舞的效果。

相似文献

1
[Rise of the machines? Left ventricular assist devices for treatment of severe heart failure].[机器崛起?用于治疗严重心力衰竭的左心室辅助装置]
Herz. 2015 Nov;40(7):972-9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-015-4365-5.
2
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
3
Can Perioperative Right Ventricular Support Prevent Postoperative Right Heart Failure in Patients With Biventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation?围手术期右心室支持能否预防接受左心室辅助装置植入的双心室功能障碍患者术后右心衰竭?
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):619-26. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.02.023. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
4
Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy: A Health Technology Assessment.用于终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Feb 8;16(3):1-60. eCollection 2016.
5
Left ventricular vs. biventricular mechanical support: Decision making and strategies for avoidance of right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室与双心室机械支持:左心室辅助装置植入术后避免右心衰竭的决策制定与策略
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;198:241-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.103. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Implantation of the continuous flow HeartWare® left ventricular assist device.植入连续流HeartWare®左心室辅助装置。
Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2013:mmt010. doi: 10.1093/mmcts/mmt010.
7
[Left ventricular assist devices in chronic therapy of heart failure. Indication, results, risks].[左心室辅助装置在心力衰竭慢性治疗中的应用。适应症、结果、风险]
Herz. 2009 Mar;34(2):148-53. doi: 10.1007/s00059-009-3214-9.
8
Outcomes after implantation of partial-support left ventricular assist devices in inotropic-dependent patients: Do we still need full-support assist devices?在依赖血管活性药物的患者中植入部分支持左心室辅助装置后的结果:我们仍然需要全支持辅助装置吗?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;148(3):1115-21; discussion 1021-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.063. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
9
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device and the right ventricle.连续流左心室辅助装置与右心室
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;23(1):86-90. doi: 10.1097/NCI.0b013e31823ef240.
10
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy in patients with preoperative hepatic failure: are we pushing the limits too far?术前肝功能衰竭患者的连续流左心室辅助装置治疗:我们是否走得太远了?
Artif Organs. 2015 Apr;39(4):336-42. doi: 10.1111/aor.12375. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.作为终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置的治疗效果:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 3;15(1):53. doi: 10.3390/life15010053.
2
[Requirements for outpatient care after implantation of a ventricular assist device : Views of patients and their relatives].[心室辅助装置植入术后门诊护理要求:患者及其亲属的观点]
Herz. 2019 May;44(3):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s00059-017-4636-4. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: Results From the ROADMAP Study.在门诊心力衰竭患者中左心室辅助装置与药物治疗的风险评估和比较效果:来自 ROADMAP 研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Oct 20;66(16):1747-1761. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.075.
2
Echocardiography and Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Evidence and Limitations.超声心动图与连续血流左心室辅助装置:证据与局限性。
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Jul;3(7):554-564. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
3
Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Rapidly Evolving Alternative to Transplant.
左心室辅助装置:一种迅速发展的移植替代方法。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jun 16;65(23):2542-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.039.
4
Risk assessment and comparative effectiveness of left ventricular assist device and medical management in ambulatory heart failure patients: design and rationale of the ROADMAP clinical trial.门诊心力衰竭患者左心室辅助装置与药物治疗的风险评估及比较效果:ROADMAP临床试验的设计与原理
Am Heart J. 2015 Feb;169(2):205-210.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
5
The war against heart failure: the Lancet lecture.与心力衰竭作斗争:柳叶刀演讲。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 28;385(9970):812-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61889-4. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
6
Sixth INTERMACS annual report: a 10,000-patient database.国际机械循环辅助装置注册研究(INTERMACS)第六年度报告:一个包含10000名患者的数据库。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jun;33(6):555-64. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
7
Moving beyond "bridges".超越“桥梁”。
JACC Heart Fail. 2013 Oct;1(5):379-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
Implant strategies change over time and impact outcomes: insights from the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).植入策略随时间而变化,并影响结果:来自 INTERMACS(机械循环辅助支持机构间注册中心)的见解。
JACC Heart Fail. 2013 Oct;1(5):369-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
9
Results of the destination therapy post-food and drug administration approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a prospective study using the INTERMACS registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).食品和药物管理局批准后连续血流左心室辅助装置治疗的结果:使用 INTERMACS 注册(机械辅助循环支持机构间注册)的前瞻性研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 6;63(17):1751-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.053. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
10
The vexing problem of thrombosis in long-term mechanical circulatory support.长期机械循环辅助中令人困扰的血栓问题。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jan;33(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 10.