Giesen Esther S, Deimel Hubertus, Bloch Wilhelm
Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sport Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Sport Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Köln, Germany.
Institute of Movement Therapy and Movement-Related Prevention and Rehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychiatry, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Köln, Germany.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 May;52:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
The therapeutic impact of exercise interventions in psychiatric diseases such as depression, anxiety and schizophrenia has already been proven through several reviews whereas substance use disorders such as alcohol use disorders (AUD) have so far less frequently been a matter of investigation. Although several publications have summarized studies focusing on physical activities in substance use disorders, no systematic review exists summarizing the evidence of exercise interventions in AUD. A total of 14 studies using the Medline Database, CCMed, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO were identified and met the inclusion criteria. In order to evaluate the evidence, we used the evaluation system of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2011). Due to methodological flaws the overall evidence of the studies is rated level "3" but primarily findings confirm that exercise interventions as a complementary treatment component in AUD are feasible and safe. No adverse events were reported. This systematic review indicates that exercise may have beneficial effects on certain domains of physical functioning including VO2max, basal heart rate, physical activity level and strength. Inconsistent effects with a slight trend towards a positive effect on anxiety, mood management, craving, and drinking behavior have been shown and need to be verified. Results must be interpreted cautiously due to the numerous methodological flaws and the heterogeneity of the interventions and measures. However, according to preclinical studies several mechanisms of action are conceivable, especially as to alcohol-related outcomes and additionally seem to be promising. RCTs with high methodological quality are urgently needed in future research to establish evidence-based exercise recommendations for the treatment of AUD.
运动干预对抑郁症、焦虑症和精神分裂症等精神疾病的治疗作用已通过多项综述得到证实,而酒精使用障碍(AUD)等物质使用障碍迄今较少受到研究关注。尽管有几篇出版物总结了针对物质使用障碍中体育活动的研究,但尚无系统综述总结运动干预对酒精使用障碍的证据。通过检索医学数据库(Medline)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CCMed)、考科蓝图书馆(Cochrane Library)和心理学文摘数据库(PsychINFO),共识别出14项符合纳入标准的研究。为了评估证据,我们采用了牛津循证医学中心(2011年)的评估系统。由于方法学上的缺陷,这些研究的总体证据等级为“3级”,但主要研究结果证实,运动干预作为酒精使用障碍的辅助治疗组成部分是可行且安全的。未报告不良事件。这项系统综述表明,运动可能对某些身体功能领域有有益影响,包括最大摄氧量、基础心率、身体活动水平和力量。研究显示,运动对焦虑、情绪管理、渴望和饮酒行为有不一致的影响,且有轻微的积极影响趋势,需要进一步验证。由于存在众多方法学缺陷以及干预措施和测量方法的异质性,结果必须谨慎解释。然而,根据临床前研究,可以设想几种作用机制,特别是与酒精相关的结果,而且似乎很有前景。未来的研究迫切需要高质量的随机对照试验,以建立基于证据的运动建议,用于治疗酒精使用障碍。