Zhu Zhipei, Zhang Li, Jiang Jiangling, Li Wei, Cao Xinyi, Zhou Zhirui, Zhang Tiansong, Li Chunbo
Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;26(6):319-31. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.214173.
There is ongoing debate about the efficacy of placebos in the treatment of mental disorders. In randomized control trials (RCTs) about the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder, the administration of a psychological placebo or placement on a waiting list are the two most common control conditions. But there has never been a systematic comparison of the clinical effect of these different strategies.
Compare the change in symptom severity among individuals treated with cognitive behavioral therapy, provided a psychological placebo, or placed on a waiting list using data from RCTs on generalized anxiety disorder.
The following databases were searched for RCTs on generalized anxiety disorder: PubMed, PsycInfo, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Chongqing VIP, Wanfang, Chinese Biological Medical Literature Database, and Taiwan Electronic Periodical Services. Studies were selected based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and the quality of each included study - based on the risk of bias and the level of evidence - was formally assessed. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan5.3 and network meta-analyses comparing the three groups were conducted using R.
Twelve studies with a combined sample size of 531 were included in the analysis. Compared to either control method (placebo or waiting list), cognitive behavioral therapy was more effective for generalized anxiety disorder. Provision of a psychological placebo was associated with a significantly greater reduction of symptoms than placement on a waiting list. Eight of the studies were classified as 'high risk of bias', and the overall level of evidence was classified as 'moderate', indicating that further research could change the overall results of the meta-analysis.
RCTs about the treatment of generalized anxiety disorders are generally of moderate quality; they indicate the superiority of CBT but the results cannot, as yet, be considered robust. There is evidence of a non-negligible treatment effect of psychological placebos used as control conditions in research studies. This effect should be considered when designing and interpreting the results of randomized controlled trials about the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions.
关于安慰剂在精神障碍治疗中的疗效存在持续的争论。在关于广泛性焦虑症治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)中,给予心理安慰剂或列入等待名单是两种最常见的对照条件。但从未对这些不同策略的临床效果进行过系统比较。
利用广泛性焦虑症RCT的数据,比较接受认知行为疗法、给予心理安慰剂或列入等待名单的个体的症状严重程度变化。
在以下数据库中检索关于广泛性焦虑症的RCT:PubMed、PsycInfo、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、重庆维普、万方、中国生物医学文献数据库和台湾电子期刊服务。根据预先定义的纳入和排除标准选择研究,并基于偏倚风险和证据水平对每个纳入研究的质量进行正式评估。使用RevMan5.3进行荟萃分析,并使用R进行比较三组的网络荟萃分析。
分析纳入了12项研究,合并样本量为531。与任何一种对照方法(安慰剂或等待名单)相比,认知行为疗法对广泛性焦虑症更有效。给予心理安慰剂与症状减轻显著大于列入等待名单相关。八项研究被归类为“高偏倚风险”,总体证据水平被归类为“中等”,表明进一步的研究可能会改变荟萃分析的总体结果。
关于广泛性焦虑症治疗的RCT总体质量中等;它们表明认知行为疗法的优越性,但结果尚未被认为是可靠的。有证据表明,在研究中用作对照条件的心理安慰剂具有不可忽视的治疗效果。在设计和解释关于心理治疗干预有效性的随机对照试验结果时,应考虑这种效果。