GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 1;80(8):822-831. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.1291.
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) can be adequately treated with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). However, there is a large gap in knowledge on factors associated with prognosis, and it is unclear whether symptom severity predicts response to CBT for SAD.
To examine baseline SAD symptom severity as a moderator of the association between CBT and symptom change in patients with SAD.
For this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA), PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 1990, to January 13, 2023. Primary search topics were social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavior therapy, and randomized controlled trial.
Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials comparing CBT with being on a waiting list and using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) in adults with a primary clinical diagnosis of SAD.
Authors of included studies were approached to provide individual-level data. Data were extracted by pairs of authors following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. An IPDMA was conducted using a 2-stage approach for the association of CBT with change in LSAS scores from baseline to posttreatment and for the interaction effect of baseline LSAS score by condition using random-effects models.
The main outcome was the baseline to posttreatment change in symptom severity measured by the LSAS.
A total of 12 studies including 1246 patients with SAD (mean [SD] age, 35.3 [10.9] years; 738 [59.2%] female) were included in the meta-analysis. A waiting list-controlled association between CBT and pretreatment to posttreatment LSAS change was found (b = -20.3; 95% CI, -24.9 to -15.6; P < .001; Cohen d = -0.95; 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.73). Baseline LSAS scores moderated the differences between CBT and waiting list with respect to pretreatment to posttreatment symptom reductions (b = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.06; P = .009), indicating that individuals with severe symptoms had larger waiting list-controlled symptom reductions after CBT (Cohen d = -1.13 [95% CI, -1.39 to -0.88] for patients with very severe SAD; Cohen d = -0.54 [95% CI, -0.80 to -0.29] for patients with mild SAD).
In this systematic review and IPDMA, higher baseline SAD symptom severity was associated with greater (absolute but not relative) symptom reductions after CBT in patients with SAD. The findings contribute to personalized care by suggesting that clinicians can confidently offer CBT to individuals with severe SAD symptoms.
社交焦虑障碍(SAD)可以通过认知行为疗法(CBT)进行充分治疗。然而,与预后相关的知识存在很大差距,并且尚不清楚 SAD 的症状严重程度是否可以预测 CBT 的反应。
研究基线 SAD 症状严重程度是否可以调节 CBT 与 SAD 患者症状变化之间的关联。
为了进行这项系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析(IPDMA),从 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 13 日,在 PubMed、PsycInfo、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中进行了搜索。主要搜索主题是社交焦虑障碍、认知行为疗法和随机对照试验。
纳入标准是比较 CBT 与候补名单以及在成年人中使用 Liebowitz 社交焦虑量表(LSAS)的主要临床诊断为 SAD 的随机临床试验。
联系了纳入研究的作者以提供个体水平的数据。作者按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)报告指南进行了数据提取,并使用 Cochrane 工具评估了偏倚风险。使用两阶段方法进行了 IPDMA,以关联 CBT 与从基线到治疗后 LSAS 评分的变化,以及使用随机效应模型以条件为基础的基线 LSAS 评分的交互作用效应。
主要结局是使用 LSAS 测量的症状严重程度从基线到治疗后的变化。
共有 12 项研究包括 1246 名 SAD 患者(平均[SD]年龄,35.3[10.9]岁;738[59.2%]为女性)纳入荟萃分析。发现 CBT 与治疗前到治疗后 LSAS 变化之间存在候补名单对照关联(b=-20.3;95%CI,-24.9 至-15.6;P<0.001;Cohen d=-0.95;95%CI,-1.16 至-0.73)。基线 LSAS 评分调节了 CBT 与候补名单之间在治疗前到治疗后症状减轻方面的差异(b=-0.22;95%CI,-0.39 至-0.06;P=0.009),表明严重症状的患者在接受 CBT 后会有更大的候补名单对照症状减轻(Cohen d=-1.13 [95%CI,-1.39 至-0.88],严重 SAD 患者;Cohen d=-0.54 [95%CI,-0.80 至-0.29],轻度 SAD 患者)。
在这项系统评价和 IPDMA 中,基线 SAD 症状严重程度越高,SAD 患者接受 CBT 后症状减轻的幅度越大(绝对幅度但不是相对幅度)。这些发现通过建议临床医生可以自信地为严重 SAD 症状的患者提供 CBT,为个性化护理做出了贡献。