Otte Christian
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13(4):413-21. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.4/cotte.
A plethora of studies have examined the efficacy and effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for adult anxiety disorders. In recent years, several meta-analyses have been conducted to quantitatively review the evidence of CBT for anxiety disorders, each using different inclusion criteria for studies, such as use of control conditions or type of study environment. This review aims to summarize and to discuss the current state of the evidence regarding CBT treatment for panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Overall, CBT demonstrates both efficacy in randomized controlled trials and effectiveness in naturalistic settings in the treatment of adult anxiety disorders. However, due to methodological issues, the magnitude of effect is currently difficult to estimate. In conclusion, CBT appears to be both efficacious and effective in the treatment of anxiety disorders, but more high-quality studies are needed to better estimate the magnitude of the effect.
大量研究探讨了认知行为疗法(CBT)对成人焦虑症的疗效和有效性。近年来,已进行了多项荟萃分析,以定量综述CBT治疗焦虑症的证据,每项分析对研究采用不同的纳入标准,例如对照条件的使用或研究环境的类型。本综述旨在总结和讨论有关CBT治疗惊恐障碍、广泛性焦虑症、社交焦虑症、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍的现有证据状况。总体而言,CBT在成人焦虑症治疗的随机对照试验中显示出疗效,在自然环境中也显示出有效性。然而,由于方法学问题,目前难以估计其效果大小。总之,CBT在焦虑症治疗中似乎既有效又有成效,但需要更多高质量研究来更好地估计其效果大小。