Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Apr;12(4):533-8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201410-494OC.
RATIONALE/OBJECTIVES: Checklist utilization has been shown to improve multiple processes of care in the intensive care unit (ICU). The ICU setting makes checklist implementation challenging, particularly when prompters are unavailable to ensure checklist compliance. We performed a prospective analysis on physician compliance reporting as a means to improve attending physician compliance with checklist use during ICU rounds.
We performed a prospective analysis of 14 attending physicians' compliance with checklist use before and after accountability measures employed at two urban academic hospitals in the United States. The accountability measures were bimonthly publication of physician checklist compliance via division e-mail and during a multidisciplinary division conference.
A total of 5,812 patient days of ICU care were assessed from April 2013 through March 2014. Compliance with checklist use during ICU rounds improved at both academic hospitals during the intervention phase. Initial compliance rates were 67% at both institutions and subsequently improved to 90 and 81%, respectively, after accountability measures were employed. During a 3-month washout phase in which no public accountability measures were employed, compliance was maintained at 89 and 78% at the two hospitals. Foley catheter, central venous catheter, and ventilator utilization rates decreased after initiation of public accountability at both hospitals.
Physician compliance reporting can be used to improve ICU physician compliance with rounding checklists when prompters are unavailable. Improved physician compliance translated into decreased rates of Foley catheter, central venous catheter, and ventilator use. These results highlight the impact physician accountability can have on patient care in the ICU.
清单的使用已被证明可以改善重症监护病房(ICU)的多项护理流程。但 ICU 的环境使得清单的实施具有挑战性,尤其是当没有提示器来确保清单的合规性时。我们对医生的合规报告进行了前瞻性分析,以此来提高主治医生在 ICU 查房时使用清单的合规性。
我们对美国两家城市学术医院的 14 名主治医生在实施问责措施前后使用清单的合规性进行了前瞻性分析。问责措施包括通过科室电子邮件每月两次公布医生的清单使用情况,以及在多学科科室会议上公布。
从 2013 年 4 月至 2014 年 3 月,共评估了 5812 天 ICU 护理。在干预阶段,两家医院的 ICU 查房时使用清单的合规性均有所提高。最初的合规率在两家医院均为 67%,之后实施问责措施后,分别提高到 90%和 81%。在没有实施公开问责措施的 3 个月洗脱期内,两家医院的合规率均维持在 89%和 78%。在两家医院实施公开问责措施后,导尿管、中心静脉导管和呼吸机的使用率均有所下降。
当没有提示器时,医生的合规报告可以用来提高 ICU 医生对查房清单的遵守率。提高医生的合规性转化为导尿管、中心静脉导管和呼吸机使用率的降低。这些结果强调了医生问责制对 ICU 患者护理的影响。