Holmes Natasha E, Tong Steven Y C, Davis Joshua S, van Hal Sebastiaan J
Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Centre for Infection Research, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Global and Tropical Health, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb;36(1):17-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1397040. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
There has been a welcome increase in the number of agents available for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Vancomycin remains an acceptable treatment option, with moves toward individualized dosing to a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target. Numerous practicalities, however, would need to be resolved before implementation. Lipoglycopeptides as a class show excellent in vitro potency. Their long half-lives and complex PKs may preclude these agents being used in critically ill patients. Anti-MRSA cephalosporins provide great promise in the treatment of MRSA. These agents, despite broad-spectrum activity, should be reserved for patients with MRSA infections as it is likely that usage will be associated with increased rates of resistance. Daptomycin is currently the only antibiotic to have shown noninferiority to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA bacteremia. The results of an open-labeled trial to address the superiority of daptomycin compared with vancomycin in reduced vancomycin susceptibility infections are eagerly anticipated. No drug to date has shown superiority to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA infections with the possible exception of linezolid in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), making linezolid an important option in the treatment of MRSA-proven HAP. Whether these strengths and features are agent or class specific are unclear but will likely be answered with the marketing of tedizolid. There are insufficient data to recommend either quinupristin/dalfopristin or tigecycline, as first line in the treatment of severe MRSA infections. These agents however remain options in patients with no other alternatives.
可用于治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的药物数量有所增加,这是值得欢迎的。万古霉素仍然是一种可接受的治疗选择,正朝着根据药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)目标进行个体化给药的方向发展。然而,在实施之前还需要解决许多实际问题。脂糖肽类总体显示出优异的体外效力。它们的长半衰期和复杂的药代动力学可能使这些药物无法用于重症患者。抗MRSA头孢菌素在MRSA治疗中前景广阔。尽管这些药物具有广谱活性,但应仅用于MRSA感染患者,因为其使用可能会导致耐药率上升。达托霉素是目前唯一一种在治疗MRSA菌血症方面显示出不劣于万古霉素的抗生素。一项开放标签试验的结果备受期待,该试验旨在探讨达托霉素与万古霉素相比在降低万古霉素敏感性感染方面的优越性。迄今为止,除了利奈唑胺在医院获得性肺炎(HAP)治疗中可能优于万古霉素外,尚无药物在MRSA感染治疗中显示出优于万古霉素的效果,这使得利奈唑胺成为已证实的MRSA-HAP治疗中的重要选择。这些优势和特点是特定药物还是特定类别所具有尚不清楚,但可能会随着替加环素的上市而得到解答。目前尚无足够数据推荐将奎奴普丁/达福普汀或替加环素作为严重MRSA感染治疗的一线用药。然而,对于没有其他选择的患者,这些药物仍是治疗选择。