Suppr超能文献

非甾体抗炎药作为阿尔茨海默病的一种治疗方法:治疗效果的系统评价和荟萃分析

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effect.

作者信息

Miguel-Álvarez Marina, Santos-Lozano Alejandro, Sanchis-Gomar Fabian, Fiuza-Luces Carmen, Pareja-Galeano Helios, Garatachea Nuria, Lucia Alejandro

机构信息

Faculty of Health Science, Ponferrada Campus, University of León, Avenida de Astorga s/n, 24400, Ponferrada, León, Spain.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2015 Feb;32(2):139-47. doi: 10.1007/s40266-015-0239-z.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the cause of more than two-thirds of all dementia cases. Although there is no effective treatment against this disorder, its association with neuroinflammation suggests that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) might represent a potential therapeutic option.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of AD using a meta-analysis approach.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library were used to search all the randomized controlled trials that have evaluated the efficacy of NSAIDs as a treatment for AD (up to 1 October 2014). The overall effect of NSAIDs versus placebo was determined using a random effects model meta-analysis where we compared changes (i.e., mean differences pre- vs. post-treatment) between the two conditions in test scores indicative of cognition, disease severity, and related outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. Diclofenac/misoprostol, nimesulide, naproxen, rofecoxib, ibuprofen, indomethacin, tarenflurbil, and celecoxib were the NSAIDs used in these reports. The results of the AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum-of-boxes (CDR-SOB), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) showed no statistical or clinical significance of NSAIDs treatment compared with placebo, i.e., mean differences of -0.24 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) -1.04 to 0.57; P = 0.52), -0.07 (95% CI -0.7 to 0.56; P = 0.82), and 0.35 (95% CI -0.34 to 1.04; P = 0.32), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Current preliminary evidence suggests no beneficial effect of NSAIDs on cognition or overall AD severity. Thus, although more research is needed in the field, the evidence available does not support the use of NSAIDs for AD treatment.

摘要

引言

阿尔茨海默病(AD)是超过三分之二痴呆病例的病因。尽管尚无针对该疾病的有效治疗方法,但它与神经炎症的关联表明,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)可能是一种潜在的治疗选择。

目的

本研究的目的是采用荟萃分析方法评估NSAIDs治疗AD的疗效。

方法

使用MEDLINE、科学网、科学Direct和考克兰图书馆检索所有评估NSAIDs作为AD治疗方法疗效的随机对照试验(截至2014年10月1日)。使用随机效应模型荟萃分析确定NSAIDs与安慰剂相比的总体效果,我们比较了两种情况下在指示认知、疾病严重程度及相关结果的测试分数中的变化(即治疗前与治疗后的平均差异)。

结果

荟萃分析最终纳入了7项研究。双氯芬酸/米索前列醇、尼美舒利(美舒宁)、萘普生、罗非昔布、布洛芬、吲哚美辛、他仑氟比、塞来昔布是这些报告中使用的NSAIDs。阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知子量表(ADAS-cog)、临床痴呆评定量表总分(CDR-SOB)和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)的结果显示,与安慰剂相比,NSAIDs治疗在统计学或临床上均无显著意义,即平均差异分别为-0.24(95%置信区间(CI)-1.04至0.57;P = 0.52)、-0.07(95%CI -0.7至0.56;P = 0.82)和0.35(95%CI -0.34至1.04;P = 0.32)。

结论

目前的初步证据表明,NSAIDs对认知或AD总体严重程度无有益影响。因此,尽管该领域需要更多研究,但现有证据不支持使用NSAIDs治疗AD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验