Madden Tessa, Secura Gina M, Nease Robert F, Politi Mary C, Peipert Jeffrey F
Division of Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Division of Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):46.e1-46.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.051. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
Contraceptive methods have differing attributes. Women's preferences for these attributes may influence contraceptive decision making. Our objective was to identify women's contraceptive preferences among women initiating a new contraceptive method.
We conducted a cross-sectional, self-administered survey of women's contraceptive preferences at the time of enrollment into the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Participants were asked to rank the importance of 15 contraceptive attributes on a 3-point scale (1 = not at all important, 2 = somewhat important, and 3 = very important) and then to rank the 3 attributes that were the most important when choosing a contraceptive method. The survey also contained questions about prior contraceptive experience and barriers to contraceptive use. Information about demographic and reproductive characteristics was collected through the CHOICE Project baseline survey.
There were 2590 women who completed the survey. Our sample was racially and socioeconomically diverse. Method attributes with the highest importance score (mean score [SD]) were effectiveness (2.97 [0.18]), safety (2.96 [0.22]), affordability (2.61 [0.61]), whether the method is long lasting (2.58 [0.61]), and whether the method is "forgettable" (2.54 [0.66]). The attributes most likely to be ranked by respondents among the top 3 attributes included effectiveness (84.2%), safety (67.8%), and side effects of the method (44.6%).
Multiple contraceptive attributes influence decision making and no single attribute drives most women's decisions. Tailoring communication and helping women make complex tradeoffs between attributes can better support their contraceptive decisions and may assist them in making value-consistent choices. This process could improve continuation and satisfaction.
避孕方法具有不同的特性。女性对这些特性的偏好可能会影响避孕决策。我们的目的是在开始采用新避孕方法的女性中确定她们对避孕方法的偏好。
我们在避孕选择项目登记时对女性的避孕偏好进行了一项横断面的自填式调查。参与者被要求按照3分制(1 = 完全不重要,2 = 有点重要,3 = 非常重要)对15种避孕特性的重要性进行排序,然后对选择避孕方法时最重要的3种特性进行排序。该调查还包含有关既往避孕经历和避孕使用障碍的问题。通过选择项目基线调查收集了有关人口统计学和生殖特征的信息。
有2590名女性完成了调查。我们的样本在种族和社会经济方面具有多样性。重要性得分最高(平均得分[标准差])的方法特性为有效性(2.97 [0.18])、安全性(2.96 [0.22])、可承受性(2.61 [0.61])、方法是否长效(2.58 [0.61])以及方法是否“无需刻意记忆”(2.54 [0.66])。受访者最有可能列为最重要的3种特性的包括有效性(84.2%)、安全性(67.8%)和方法的副作用(44.6%)。
多种避孕特性会影响决策,没有单一特性驱动大多数女性的决策。调整沟通方式并帮助女性在特性之间进行复杂的权衡,可以更好地支持她们的避孕决策,并可能帮助她们做出符合价值观的选择。这一过程可以提高持续性和满意度。