Suppr超能文献

对“支柱4生命”的评估:一项针对癌症幸存者的虚拟应对技能项目。

Evaluation of Pillars4life: a virtual coping skills program for cancer survivors.

作者信息

Smith Sophia K, O'Donnell Jonathan D, Abernethy Amy P, MacDermott Kristin, Staley Tina, Samsa Gregory P

机构信息

Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2015 Nov;24(11):1407-15. doi: 10.1002/pon.3750. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pillars4Life is an educational program that teaches coping skills to cancer patients in a virtual group setting; it was recently implemented at 17 hospitals across the USA. The cost-effective, scalable, and assessable Pillars4Life curriculum targets psychosocial resources (e.g., self-efficacy and coping skills) as a means to reduce symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) and enhance quality of life.

METHODS

Cancer patients were recruited from hospitals that received the LIVESTRONG Community Impact Project Award to enroll in a pilot study of Pillars4Life. Consenting participants met with a certified instructor weekly for 10 weeks in a virtual environment; the manualized intervention trained participants in personal coping skills. Longitudinal assessments over 6 months were assessed using validated instruments to determine changes in Pillars4Life targeted resources and outcomes. Multiple linear regression models examined the relationship between changes in targeted resources and changes in outcome from baseline to 3 months post-intervention.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 130) had the following characteristics: mean age of 56 ± 11 years, 87% women, 11% non-Caucasian, and 77% with college degree. At 3- and 6-month follow-up, mean scores improved on all key outcome measures such as depression (Patient Health Questionnaire), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder), posttraumatic stress (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue), and well-being (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) from baseline (all p < 0.01); results were most pronounced among participants who reported ≥4/10 on the Distress Thermometer at baseline (all p < 0.001). Changes in each targeted resource were associated with 3-month improvements in at least one outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in the Pillars4Life program was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvements in scores on pre-specified outcomes and targeted resources.

摘要

目的

“支柱4生命”是一个教育项目,在虚拟小组环境中向癌症患者传授应对技巧;该项目最近在美国的17家医院实施。具有成本效益、可扩展且可评估的“支柱4生命”课程以心理社会资源(如自我效能感和应对技巧)为目标,作为减轻症状(如抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激)并提高生活质量的一种手段。

方法

从获得“坚强生活社区影响项目奖”的医院招募癌症患者,参加“支柱4生命”的一项试点研究。同意参与的参与者在虚拟环境中每周与一名认证教员会面,为期10周;该标准化干预培训参与者的个人应对技巧。使用经过验证的工具进行为期6个月的纵向评估,以确定“支柱4生命”目标资源和结果的变化。多元线性回归模型检验了目标资源变化与干预后3个月相对于基线的结果变化之间的关系。

结果

参与者(n = 130)具有以下特征:平均年龄56±11岁,87%为女性,11%为非白种人,77%拥有大学学位。在3个月和6个月的随访中,所有关键结果指标的平均得分均较基线有所改善,如抑郁(患者健康问卷)、焦虑(广泛性焦虑症)、创伤后应激(创伤后应激障碍检查表)、疲劳(慢性病治疗功能评估-疲劳)和幸福感(癌症治疗功能评估-一般)(所有p < 0.01);在基线时在痛苦温度计上报告≥4/10的参与者中,结果最为显著(所有p < 0.001)。每种目标资源的变化与至少一项结果在3个月时的改善相关。

结论

参与“支柱4生命”项目与预先指定的结果和目标资源得分在统计学和临床上的显著改善相关。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Pillars4life: a virtual coping skills program for cancer survivors.
Psychooncology. 2015 Nov;24(11):1407-15. doi: 10.1002/pon.3750. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
4
A chronic care ostomy self-management program for cancer survivors.
Psychooncology. 2016 May;25(5):574-81. doi: 10.1002/pon.4078. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
Resource loss, self-efficacy, and family support predict posttraumatic stress symptoms: a 3-year study of earthquake survivors.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2015;28(3):239-53. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2014.955018. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

3
Reimagine: a randomized controlled trial of an online, symptom self-management curriculum among breast cancer survivors.
Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1775-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4431-7. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
5
Anxiety and Depression in Cancer Survivors.
Med Clin North Am. 2017 Nov;101(6):1099-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

2
Web- vs. telehealth-based delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: a randomized controlled trial.
Sleep Med. 2014 Feb;15(2):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
3
Psychodynamic guided self-help for adult depression through the internet: a randomised controlled trial.
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e38021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038021. Epub 2012 May 29.
4
Validation of the Patient Care Monitor (Version 2.0): a review of system assessment instrument for cancer patients.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Oct;40(4):545-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.01.017. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
5
Phase 2 pilot study of Pathfinders: a psychosocial intervention for cancer patients.
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Jul;18(7):893-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0823-z. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
7
A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
8
Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar 1;24(7):1105-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.2846.
10
Introduction: resilience of cancer survivors across the lifespan.
Cancer. 2005 Dec 1;104(11 Suppl):2543-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21487.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验