• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Pathfinders 心理社会干预癌症患者的 2 期试点研究。

Phase 2 pilot study of Pathfinders: a psychosocial intervention for cancer patients.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center (DUMC), Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2010 Jul;18(7):893-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0823-z. Epub 2010 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-010-0823-z
PMID:20143102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3160827/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pathfinders is a multi-faceted psychosocial care program for cancer patients; it was developed in community oncology and adapted to the academic oncology setting. This prospective, single-arm, phase 2 pilot study examined the acceptability and feasibility of Pathfinders for women with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Over 3 months, participants completed patient-reported surveys including the Patient Care Monitor (PCM, review of systems), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B), Self Efficacy, and a single-item survey asking patients whether the program was helpful to them. A technology-based data collection system was used to capture electronic patient-reported outcomes at point of care, report symptoms in real time to clinicians, and collect warehouse data to provide a detailed longitudinal picture of the patient experience when receiving Pathfinders.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 50) were: mean age 51 (SD 11); 76% white, 20% black; 74% married; 50% college degree. Forty-two (n = 42) patients completed baseline and 3-month assessments. Statistically significant improvements (all P < 0.05) occurred in PCM subscales for Distress (mean [SE] = -3.42 [1.21]), Despair (-4.53 [1.56]), and Quality of Life (2.88 [0.97]), and the FACT-B Emotional Wellbeing subscale (2.07 [0.46]). Of the 29 participants asked if Pathfinders was helpful, 27 (93%) responded positively and two did not respond. Other instruments measuring symptoms, quality of life, and self-efficacy showed improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

In a phase 2 pilot study, Pathfinders was helpful to patients and is feasible in an academic medical center. Follow-up data collected at the 3-month assessment suggest that the program impacts various psychological outcomes, notably distress and despair.

摘要

目的

Pathfinders 是一个多方面的癌症患者心理社会关怀项目;它是在社区肿瘤学中开发的,并适用于学术肿瘤学环境。这项前瞻性、单臂、2 期试点研究考察了 Pathfinders 对转移性乳腺癌女性的可接受性和可行性。

方法

在 3 个月的时间里,参与者完成了患者报告的调查,包括患者护理监测器(PCM,系统回顾)、慢性疾病治疗-乳腺癌功能评估量表(FACT-B)、自我效能感,以及一项要求患者回答该项目是否对他们有帮助的单项调查。一个基于技术的数据收集系统用于在护理点捕获电子患者报告的结果,实时向临床医生报告症状,并收集仓库数据,提供患者接受 Pathfinders 时的详细纵向体验。

结果

参与者(n=50):平均年龄 51(SD 11);76%为白人,20%为黑人;74%已婚;50%具有大学学历。42 名(n=42)患者完成了基线和 3 个月的评估。PCM 子量表中的痛苦(均值[SE]=-3.42[1.21])、绝望(-4.53[1.56])和生活质量(2.88[0.97])以及 FACT-B 情绪健康子量表(2.07[0.46])均出现了统计学显著改善(均 P<0.05)。在被问及 Pathfinders 是否有帮助的 29 名参与者中,有 27 名(93%)回答是,有 2 名未回答。其他衡量症状、生活质量和自我效能感的工具也显示出改善。

结论

在 2 期试点研究中,Pathfinders 对患者有帮助,并且在学术医疗中心是可行的。在 3 个月评估时收集的随访数据表明,该项目对各种心理结果产生了影响,特别是痛苦和绝望。

相似文献

1
Phase 2 pilot study of Pathfinders: a psychosocial intervention for cancer patients.Pathfinders 心理社会干预癌症患者的 2 期试点研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Jul;18(7):893-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0823-z. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
2
Correlates of quality of life-related outcomes in breast cancer patients participating in the Pathfinders pilot study.参与 Pathfinders 试点研究的乳腺癌患者生活质量相关结局的相关因素。
Psychooncology. 2011 May;20(5):559-64. doi: 10.1002/pon.1770.
3
Acceptance and commitment therapy for older people with treatment-resistant generalised anxiety disorder: the FACTOID feasibility study.接受和承诺疗法治疗治疗抵抗的老年广泛性焦虑障碍:FACTOID 可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(54):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta25540.
4
A randomized pilot trial of a positive affect skill intervention (lessons in linking affect and coping) for women with metastatic breast cancer.一项针对转移性乳腺癌女性的积极情绪技能干预(情绪与应对关联课程)的随机试点试验。
Psychooncology. 2017 Dec;26(12):2101-2108. doi: 10.1002/pon.4312. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
5
Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a self-directed online psychosocial intervention for women with metastatic breast cancer: Finding My Way-Advanced.自我导向型在线心理社会干预对转移性乳腺癌女性的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效:Finding My Way-Advanced。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Oct 22;32(11):744. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08924-2.
6
Specialist breast care nurses for support of women with breast cancer.专科乳腺护理护士为乳腺癌女性提供支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 3;2(2):CD005634. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005634.pub3.
7
[Intervention focused on resources to reduce anxiety and depression disorders in cancer patients: A pilot study].[聚焦于减少癌症患者焦虑和抑郁障碍资源的干预措施:一项试点研究]
Encephale. 2020 Feb;46(1):13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
8
Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care.电子患者报告数据采集作为快速学习癌症护理的基础。
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S32-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181db53a4.
9
The psychosocial experiences of women with breast cancer across the lifespan: a systematic review protocol.乳腺癌女性患者一生中心理社会经历的系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):112-21. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1795.
10
Feasibility and acceptability to patients of a longitudinal system for evaluating cancer-related symptoms and quality of life: pilot study of an e/Tablet data-collection system in academic oncology.用于评估癌症相关症状和生活质量的纵向系统对患者的可行性和可接受性:学术肿瘤学中电子/平板电脑数据收集系统的试点研究
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jun;37(6):1027-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.07.011. Epub 2009 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial interventions and health-related quality of life in adults with incurable cancer: systematic review.心理社会干预与不可治愈癌症成人患者的健康相关生活质量:系统评价
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025 Aug 26;15(5):572-585. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-005043.
2
Immigration Transition and Symptom Distress Changes by a Technology-Based Intervention: Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors.基于技术的干预对移民过渡期症状困扰变化的影响:亚裔美国乳腺癌幸存者。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 May 1;41(5):316-322. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000938.
3
Information Needs of Asian American Breast Cancer Survivors: a Decision Tree Analysis.亚裔美国乳腺癌幸存者的信息需求:决策树分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Dec;37(6):1902-1911. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02059-2. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
4
Impact of the mental health and dynamic referral for oncology (MHADRO) program on oncology patient outcomes, health care utilization, and health provider behaviors: A multi-site randomized control trial.心理健康和肿瘤动态转诊(MHADRO)项目对肿瘤患者结局、医疗保健利用和卫生提供者行为的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Mar;103(3):607-616. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
5
Reimagine: a randomized controlled trial of an online, symptom self-management curriculum among breast cancer survivors.再想象:一项在线、症状自我管理课程对乳腺癌幸存者的随机对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1775-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4431-7. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
6
Determinants of longitudinal health-related quality-of-life change in children with asthma from low-income families: a report from the PROMIS Pediatric Asthma Study.低收入家庭哮喘儿童纵向健康相关生活质量变化的决定因素:PROMIS儿童哮喘研究报告
Clin Exp Allergy. 2017 Mar;47(3):383-394. doi: 10.1111/cea.12827. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
7
Indicators of distress in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.新诊断乳腺癌患者的痛苦指标。
PeerJ. 2015 Jul 21;3:e1107. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1107. eCollection 2015.
8
Evaluation of Pillars4life: a virtual coping skills program for cancer survivors.对“支柱4生命”的评估:一项针对癌症幸存者的虚拟应对技能项目。
Psychooncology. 2015 Nov;24(11):1407-15. doi: 10.1002/pon.3750. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
9
Structured decision-making: using personalized medicine to improve the value of cancer care.结构化决策:利用个性化医学提高癌症护理的价值。
J Pers Med. 2012 Dec 27;3(1):1-13. doi: 10.3390/jpm3010001.
10
Use of an electronic patient-reported outcome measurement system to improve distress management in oncology.使用电子患者报告结局测量系统改善肿瘤学中的痛苦管理。
Palliat Support Care. 2014 Feb;12(1):69-73. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000345. Epub 2013 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data.使用平板电脑收集具有研究质量的患者报告数据,以提高医疗保健效率和质量。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec;43(6):1975-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00887.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
2
Changes in quality of life among breast cancer patients three years post-diagnosis.乳腺癌患者确诊三年后生活质量的变化。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Mar;114(2):357-69. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0008-3. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
3
Validation of the Cancer Care Monitor items for physical symptoms and treatment side effects using expert oncology nurse evaluation.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Mar;31(3):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.07.009.
4
You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE.你想测量应对方式,但你的方案太长:可以考虑使用简易应对方式问卷。
Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.
5
Health promotion by social cognitive means.通过社会认知手段促进健康。
Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):143-64. doi: 10.1177/1090198104263660.
6
Longitudinal quality of life in advanced cancer patients: pilot study results from a VA medical cancer center.晚期癌症患者的纵向生活质量:来自一家退伍军人事务部医疗癌症中心的初步研究结果
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Mar;25(3):225-35. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00641-3.
7
Posttraumatic stress disorder following cancer. A conceptual and empirical review.癌症后的创伤后应激障碍。一项概念性与实证性综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2002 May;22(4):499-524. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00118-0.
8
Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy--Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp).测量癌症患者的精神健康:慢性病治疗功能评估——精神健康量表(FACIT-Sp)。
Ann Behav Med. 2002 Winter;24(1):49-58. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_06.
9
The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site.按癌症部位划分的心理困扰患病率。
Psychooncology. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):19-28. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<19::aid-pon501>3.0.co;2-6.
10
Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory.评估癌症患者的症状困扰:MD安德森症状问卷
Cancer. 2000 Oct 1;89(7):1634-46. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1634::aid-cncr29>3.0.co;2-v.