Kantoor Pallavi, Srivastava Nikhil, Rana Vivek, Adlakha Vivek K
Department of Paedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Subharti Dental College, Meerut, India.
Dent Traumatol. 2015 Aug;31(4):308-13. doi: 10.1111/edt.12158. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
Total or partial loss of tooth structure occured due to caries or trauma. The decayed or fractured tooth is restored with appropriate restorative materials. A range of restorative materials are available in the market today, but each of them has one or the other drawbacks, viz. color mismatch, variable wear resistance, and strength. Therefore, there has always been a quest to use a restorative material which has properties as close to natural tooth as possible. Extracted human teeth have been tried as restorative materials with good success rate, but their storage has been a problem due to change in physical properties.
To evaluate the changes in the mechanical properties of the extracted human teeth to be used as biological restoration upon storing them in different storage media and to compare their effectiveness.
Five hundred and twenty extracted human teeth (samples) included in the study were equally distributed and randomly stored in different storage media (saline, artificial saliva, ORS, coconut water, and eye solution), and their mechanical properties were checked at different time intervals (7, 14, and 30 days) using universal testing machine and Vickers hardness test.
None of the storage media used in the study significantly altered mechanical properties of the stored extracted human teeth except the hardness which was substantially reduced after storing for 30 days. Of the 4 media tested, eye solution was found to be the best, while artificial saliva was found to be least effective as storage media. It was also concluded that storage time of the extracted teeth to be used as biological restorations should not exceed more than 3-4 weeks as beyond this time, mechanical properties namely hardness get altered significantly.
由于龋齿或外伤,牙齿结构会出现全部或部分丧失。龋坏或折断的牙齿要用合适的修复材料进行修复。如今市场上有一系列修复材料,但每种材料都有这样或那样的缺点,即颜色不匹配、耐磨性和强度各异。因此,人们一直在寻求使用一种性能尽可能接近天然牙齿的修复材料。已尝试将拔除的人牙用作修复材料,成功率很高,但由于物理性能的变化,其储存一直是个问题。
评估拔除的人牙在不同储存介质中储存后用作生物修复材料时的力学性能变化,并比较其效果。
本研究纳入的520颗拔除的人牙(样本)平均分配并随机储存在不同的储存介质(生理盐水、人工唾液、口服补液盐、椰子水和眼药水)中,并在不同时间间隔(7天、14天和30天)使用万能试验机和维氏硬度测试检查其力学性能。
本研究中使用的储存介质均未显著改变储存的拔除人牙的力学性能,但硬度在储存30天后大幅降低。在所测试的4种介质中,眼药水被发现是最佳的,而人工唾液被发现是作为储存介质效果最差的。还得出结论,用作生物修复材料的拔除牙齿的储存时间不应超过3 - 4周,因为超过这个时间,硬度等力学性能会发生显著变化。