• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Too much focus on low-quality science?

作者信息

Campbell Norm, L'Abbe Mary R, McHenry Earle W

机构信息

Departments of Medicine, Community Health Sciences, Physiology and Pharmacology (Campbell), Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, O'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Nutritional Sciences (L'Abbe, McHenry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2015 Feb 3;187(2):131-132. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.115-0005.

DOI:10.1503/cmaj.115-0005
PMID:25646375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4312157/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Too much focus on low-quality science?是否过度关注低质量科学？
CMAJ. 2015 Feb 3;187(2):131-132. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.115-0005.
2
Controversial sodium guidelines: scientific solution or perpetual debate?有争议的钠摄入指南：科学解决方案还是无休止的争论？
CMAJ. 2015 Feb 3;187(2):95-96. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.141011. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
3
AN ATTEMPT TO HALT THE EVER-INCREASING PREVALENCE OF MORBIDITIES RESULTING FROM EXCESS DIETARY SODIUM INTAKE. The Lebanese Experience.
J Med Liban. 2016 Aug;64(2):63-64.
4
Is sodium restriction important to hypertension? The argument against.钠限制对高血压很重要吗？反对的观点。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2004 Jun;6(6):337-9.
5
Public policy and dietary sodium restriction.公共政策与膳食钠限制
JAMA. 2010 May 19;303(19):1916; author reply 1917-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.587.
6
Is sodium restriction important to hypertension? The argument for.钠限制对高血压很重要吗？支持的观点。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2004 Jun;6(6):335-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03528.x.
7
Sodium and potassium intake: mortality effects and policy implications: comment on "Sodium and potassium intake and mortality among US adults".钠和钾的摄入量：对死亡率的影响及政策含义：评《美国成年人钠和钾的摄入量与死亡率》
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jul 11;171(13):1191-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.271.
8
Dietary Sodium and the Health of Canadians.膳食钠与加拿大人的健康。
Can J Cardiol. 2019 May;35(5):671.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
9
Dietary salt reductions and cardiovascular disease.饮食中盐的减少与心血管疾病
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 10;362(23):2225; author reply 2225-6.
10
The great salt war.大盐战争
Am J Hypertens. 1997 May;10(5 Pt 1):584-5.

引用本文的文献

1
[Salt restriction in people with hypertension and patients with cardiovascular disease : meaningfulness and extent].[高血压患者和心血管疾病患者的限盐：意义与程度]
Internist (Berl). 2015 Jul;56(7):784-90. doi: 10.1007/s00108-015-3674-3.
2
Forum.
CMAJ. 2015 Apr 7;187(6):439. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.115-0027.

本文引用的文献

1
Controversial sodium guidelines: scientific solution or perpetual debate?有争议的钠摄入指南：科学解决方案还是无休止的争论？
CMAJ. 2015 Feb 3;187(2):95-96. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.141011. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
2
Validation and comparison of three formulae to estimate sodium and potassium excretion from a single-morning fasting urine compared to 24-h measures in 11 countries.在11个国家中，将三种用于根据单次晨尿估算钠和钾排泄量的公式与24小时测量结果进行验证和比较。
J Hypertens. 2014 Dec;32(12):2499-500. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000404.
3
Is reducing dietary sodium controversial? Is it the conduct of studies with flawed research methods that is controversial? A perspective from the World Hypertension League Executive Committee.
减少膳食钠摄入存在争议吗？存在争议的是采用有缺陷研究方法开展的研究吗？世界高血压联盟执行委员会的观点。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Feb;17(2):85-6. doi: 10.1111/jch.12437. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
4
Urinary sodium and potassium excretion, mortality, and cardiovascular events.尿钠和尿钾排泄、死亡率和心血管事件。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 14;371(7):612-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311889.
5
A call for quality research on salt intake and health: from the World Hypertension League and supporting organizations.世界高血压联盟及支持组织呼吁开展关于盐摄入量与健康的高质量研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Jul;16(7):469-71. doi: 10.1111/jch.12364.
6
Methodological issues in cohort studies that relate sodium intake to cardiovascular disease outcomes: a science advisory from the American Heart Association.队列研究中与钠摄入量与心血管疾病结局相关的方法学问题：美国心脏协会的科学建议。
Circulation. 2014 Mar 11;129(10):1173-86. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000015. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
7
Dietary sodium: a perspective on recent sodium evidence--its interpretation and controversies.膳食钠：关于近期钠相关证据的观点——其解读与争议
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Nov;15(11):765-8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12187. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
8
An update on the salt wars-genuine controversy, poor science, or vested interest?盐战风云更新——是真正的争议，还是糟糕的科学，亦或是既得利益？
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2013 Dec;15(6):687-93. doi: 10.1007/s11906-013-0389-5.
9
Flawed evidence should not derail sound policy: the case remains strong for population-wide sodium reduction.有缺陷的证据不应阻碍合理的政策：在全人群中减少钠摄入的理由依然充分。
Am J Hypertens. 2013 Oct;26(10):1183-6. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt147.
10
Effect of lower sodium intake on health: systematic review and meta-analyses.低钠摄入对健康的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2013 Apr 3;346:f1326. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1326.