Hoeschele Marisa, Merchant Hugo, Kikuchi Yukiko, Hattori Yuko, ten Cate Carel
Department of Cognitive Biology, Vienna, Austria
Instituto de Neurobiologia, UNAM, Campus Juriquilla, Santiago de Querétaro, Mexico.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 19;370(1664):20140094. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0094.
In the introduction to this theme issue, Honing et al. suggest that the origins of musicality--the capacity that makes it possible for us to perceive, appreciate and produce music--can be pursued productively by searching for components of musicality in other species. Recent studies have highlighted that the behavioural relevance of stimuli to animals and the relation of experimental procedures to their natural behaviour can have a large impact on the type of results that can be obtained for a given species. Through reviewing laboratory findings on animal auditory perception and behaviour, as well as relevant findings on natural behaviour, we provide evidence that both traditional laboratory studies and studies relating to natural behaviour are needed to answer the problem of musicality. Traditional laboratory studies use synthetic stimuli that provide more control than more naturalistic studies, and are in many ways suitable to test the perceptual abilities of animals. However, naturalistic studies are essential to inform us as to what might constitute relevant stimuli and parameters to test with laboratory studies, or why we may or may not expect certain stimulus manipulations to be relevant. These two approaches are both vital in the comparative study of musicality.
在本期主题特刊的引言中,霍宁等人指出,通过在其他物种中寻找音乐性的组成部分,可以有效地探究音乐性的起源——即我们感知、欣赏和创作音乐的能力。最近的研究强调,刺激对动物的行为相关性以及实验程序与其自然行为的关系,可能会对给定物种所能获得的结果类型产生重大影响。通过回顾关于动物听觉感知和行为的实验室研究结果,以及关于自然行为的相关发现,我们提供证据表明,需要传统实验室研究和与自然行为相关的研究来解决音乐性问题。传统实验室研究使用合成刺激,与更自然主义的研究相比,能提供更多的控制,并且在许多方面适合测试动物的感知能力。然而,自然主义研究对于告知我们哪些可能构成用于实验室研究的相关刺激和参数,或者为什么我们可能期望或不期望某些刺激操作具有相关性至关重要。这两种方法在音乐性的比较研究中都至关重要。