Lai Olimpia R, Di Bello Antonio, Soloperto Simona, Freggi Daniela, Marzano Giacomo, Cavaliere Leonardo, Crescenzo Giuseppe
1 Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, s.p. Casamassima km 3, Valenzano (BA), 70010 Italy.
J Wildl Dis. 2015 Apr;51(2):509-12. doi: 10.7589/2014-03-069. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
Data on reptile analgesia are scarce for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids and almost completely lacking in sea turtles, even though emergencies requiring correct pain management are very frequent in their rehabilitative medicine; therefore, dosage regimens extrapolated from other species involve the risk of clinical failure and damage to the animals. We describe the pharmacokinetic behavior of meloxicam in the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). We chose meloxicam because of its selective anti-cyclooxygenase-2 activity and lesser adverse side effects. No data are available on the capacity of turtles to tolerate NSAIDs, so we chose a dose of 0.1 mg/kg of meloxicam. Plasma concentrations of meloxicam were unexpectedly low both for intravenous (IV; maximum concentration [C(max)] = 0.04±0.02 µg/mL) and intramuscular (IM; C(max) = 0.07±0.09 µg/mL) administration. A double-peak phenomenon occurred after both IV (time for second peak concentration T(max2) = 10.33±10.89 h) and IM (T(max2) = 1.17±0.75 h). The second peak after IM injection was premature, so some difficulty and delay in absorption appears to be an appropriate explanation. Furthermore, the area under the curve, and therefore systemic bioavailability (F = 31.82±28.24%), after both IV (0.30±0.29) and IM (0.10±0.03) injection appeared particularly limited. Terminal elimination slope and mean residence time indicated fast elimination after IM dosing; as a consequence, plasma concentrations dropped below analytic limits in 8 h. Considering that IM is the favored route of administration of drugs in rescue centers, it is unlikely that meloxicam at 0.1 mg/kg is an appropriate choice, particularly in long-term pain management protocols.
关于非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和阿片类药物在爬行动物镇痛方面的数据很少,而在海龟中几乎完全没有,尽管在其康复医学中需要正确疼痛管理的紧急情况非常频繁;因此,从其他物种推断出的给药方案存在临床失败和对动物造成损害的风险。我们描述了美洛昔康在蠵龟(Caretta caretta)中的药代动力学行为。我们选择美洛昔康是因为其选择性环氧化酶-2活性和较小的副作用。目前尚无关于海龟耐受NSAIDs能力的数据,因此我们选择了0.1mg/kg的美洛昔康剂量。静脉注射(IV;最大浓度[C(max)] = 0.04±0.02μg/mL)和肌肉注射(IM;C(max) = 0.07±0.09μg/mL)美洛昔康后的血浆浓度均出乎意料地低。静脉注射(第二个峰浓度出现时间T(max2) = 10.33±10.89小时)和肌肉注射(T(max2) = 1.17±0.75小时)后均出现双峰现象。肌肉注射后的第二个峰出现过早,因此吸收方面的一些困难和延迟似乎是一个合理的解释。此外,静脉注射(0.30±0.29)和肌肉注射(0.10±0.03)后的曲线下面积以及因此的全身生物利用度(F = 31.82±28.24%)似乎特别有限。终末消除斜率和平均驻留时间表明肌肉注射给药后消除迅速;因此,血浆浓度在8小时内降至分析限度以下。考虑到肌肉注射是救援中心常用的给药途径,0.1mg/kg的美洛昔康不太可能是一个合适的选择,特别是在长期疼痛管理方案中。