Taramasso Maurizio, Maisano Francesco, Denti Paolo, Guidotti Andrea, Sticchi Alessandro, Pozzoli Alberto, Buzzatti Nicola, De Bonis Michele, La Canna Giovanni, Alfieri Ottavio
Klinik für Herz- und Gefässchirurgie, Cardiac Surgery Department, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; Cardiac Surgery Department, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Klinik für Herz- und Gefässchirurgie, Cardiac Surgery Department, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 May;149(5):1270-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.041. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
The aim of this study is to report the long-term outcomes (median follow-up time, 7 years; range, 1 month to 14 years) of patients who underwent surgery for paravalvular leak in our single-center experience.
From October 2000 to November 2007, 122 consecutive patients underwent surgery for symptomatic paravalvular leak (40 patients with aortic paravalvular leak; 82 with mitral paravalvular leak). In 7 patients (5.7%, all mitral), surgery was performed on the beating heart through a right thoracotomy. In 35% of patients, multiple paravalvular leaks were present.
The mean age of patients was 62 ± 11 years, and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II was 7.2% ± 6%. Most of the patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV (60%). Symptomatic hemolysis was present in 31% of the patients, and 41% of the patients had more than 1 previous cardiac operation. Paravalvular leak repair was feasible in 79 patients (65%), whereas in 43 patients (35%) prosthesis re-replacement was required. Thirty-day mortality was 10.7% (13/122 patients; 5% for aortic paravalvular leak and 13% for mitral paravalvular leak; P = .1); 2 patients (1.6%) with residual severe mitral paravalvular leak underwent successful redo surgery before discharge. Median length of stay was 7 days. Overall actuarial survival was 39% ± 6% at 12 years; freedom from cardiac death was 54% ± 7% at 12 years. Only 1 patient underwent redo surgery during follow-up. Multivariable analysis identified preoperative chronic renal failure (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.9; P = .03) and more than 1 previous cardiac reoperation (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4; P = .03) as independent predictors of death at follow-up.
The operative mortality of surgical treatment of paravalvular leak is still high. Long-term outcomes remain suboptimal in these challenging patients, especially in the presence of multiple previous cardiac operations and associated co-pathologies. These results support the importance of alternative therapeutic options.
本研究旨在报告在我们单中心经验中接受瓣周漏手术患者的长期结局(中位随访时间7年;范围1个月至14年)。
从2000年10月至2007年11月,122例连续患者接受了有症状瓣周漏手术(40例主动脉瓣周漏患者;82例二尖瓣周漏患者)。7例患者(5.7%,均为二尖瓣周漏)通过右胸切口在心脏跳动下进行手术。35%的患者存在多个瓣周漏。
患者的平均年龄为62±11岁,欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II为7.2%±6%。大多数患者处于纽约心脏协会心功能III或IV级(60%)。31%的患者存在有症状溶血,41%的患者既往有超过1次心脏手术。79例患者(65%)可行瓣周漏修复,而43例患者(35%)需要再次置换人工瓣膜。30天死亡率为10.7%(13/122例患者;主动脉瓣周漏为5%,二尖瓣周漏为13%;P = 0.1);2例(1.6%)残留严重二尖瓣周漏的患者在出院前成功进行了再次手术。中位住院时间为7天。12年时总体精算生存率为39%±6%;12年时无心脏死亡生存率为54%±7%。随访期间仅1例患者接受了再次手术。多变量分析确定术前慢性肾功能衰竭(风险比,2.6;95%置信区间,1.4 - 4.9;P = 0.03)和既往有超过1次心脏再次手术(风险比,2.3;95%置信区间,1.3 - 4;P = 0.03)为随访时死亡的独立预测因素。
瓣周漏手术治疗的手术死亡率仍然很高。在这些具有挑战性的患者中,长期结局仍然不理想,尤其是在既往有多次心脏手术及相关合并症的情况下。这些结果支持了替代治疗选择的重要性。