Gelasakis Athanasios I, Arsenos Georgios, Valergakis Georgios E, Banos Georgios
Laboratory of Animal Husbandry,School of Veterinary Medicine,Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,Box 393,54124 Thessaloniki,Greece.
J Dairy Res. 2015 May;82(2):193-9. doi: 10.1017/S0022029915000059. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
The objective of the study was twofold: (i) to quantify the differences in daily milk yield (DMY) and total milk yield (TMY) between lame and non-lame dairy ewes and (ii) to determine the shape of lactation curves around the lameness incident. The overall study was a prospective study of lameness for the surveyed sheep population, with a nested study including the selection of matching controls for each lame ewe separately. Two intensively reared flocks of purebred Chios ewes and a total of 283 ewes were used. Data, including gait assessment and DMY records, were collected on a weekly basis during on-farm visits across the milking period. A general linear model was developed for the calculation of lactation curves of lame and non-lame ewes, whereas one-way ANOVA was used for the comparisons between lame ewes and their controls. Lameness incidence was 12.4 and 16.8% on Farms A and B, respectively. Average DMY in lame ewes was significantly lower (213.8 g, P < 0.001) compared with the rest of the flock, where DMY averaged 1.340 g. The highest DMY reduction in lame ewes was observed during the week 16 of the milking period (P < 0.001), whereas the reduction of DMY, for lame ewes, remained significant at P < 0.001 level from week 8 to week 28 of milking. Comparisons between lame and controls revealed that at the week of lameness diagnosis a significant DMY reduction (P ≤ 0.001) was observed in lame ewes (about 32.5%), which was maximised 1 week later (35.8%, P ≤ 0.001) and continued for several weeks after recovery, resulting in 19.3% lower TMY for lame ewes for the first 210 d of the milking period (P < 0.01). Moreover, at flock level, TMY for non-lame and lame ewes, as calculated by the general linear model, was 318.9 and 268.0 kg, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate evidence of significant financial losses in dairy sheep due to lameness which, however, need to be accurately estimated in further, more detailed, analyses.
(i)量化跛足和非跛足奶羊的日产奶量(DMY)和总产奶量(TMY)之间的差异;(ii)确定跛足事件前后泌乳曲线的形状。整个研究是对被调查羊群跛足情况的前瞻性研究,其中嵌套研究包括为每只跛足母羊分别挑选匹配的对照。使用了两个集约化饲养的纯种希俄斯母羊群,共283只母羊。在挤奶期的农场走访期间,每周收集包括步态评估和DMY记录在内的数据。建立了一个通用线性模型来计算跛足和非跛足母羊的泌乳曲线,而单向方差分析用于跛足母羊与其对照之间的比较。A农场和B农场的跛足发生率分别为12.4%和16.8%。与羊群其他母羊相比,跛足母羊的平均DMY显著更低(213.8克,P<0.001),羊群其他母羊的平均DMY为1340克。在挤奶期第16周观察到跛足母羊的DMY降幅最大(P<0.001),而对于跛足母羊,从挤奶第8周到第28周,DMY降幅在P<0.001水平仍显著。跛足母羊与其对照之间的比较显示,在跛足诊断周,跛足母羊的DMY显著下降(P≤0.001)(约32.5%),1周后降至最大(35.8%,P≤0.001),并在恢复后持续数周,导致跛足母羊在挤奶期前210天的TMY降低19.3%(P<0.01)。此外,在畜群水平上,通过通用线性模型计算,非跛足和跛足母羊的TMY分别为318.9千克和268.0千克。本研究结果表明,跛足会给奶羊造成重大经济损失,不过,这需要在进一步更详细的分析中进行准确估算。