Suppr超能文献

英国的医学选拔:靠运气还是凭能力?

UK medical selection: lottery or meritocracy?

作者信息

Harris Benjamin H L, Walsh Jason L, Lammy Simon

机构信息

John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK, and non-stipendiary lecturer, St Anne's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2015 Feb;15(1):40-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-1-40.

Abstract

From senior school through to consultancy, a plethora of assessments shape medical careers. Multiple methods of assessment are used to discriminate between applicants. Medical selection in the UK appears to be moving increasingly towards non-knowledge-based testing at all career stages. We review the evidence for non-knowledge-based tests and discuss their perceived benefits. We raise the question: is the current use of non-knowledge-based tests within the UK at risk of undermining more robust measures of medical school and postgraduate performance?

摘要

从高中到顾问阶段,大量评估塑造着医学职业生涯。多种评估方法被用于区分申请者。在英国,医学选拔在所有职业阶段似乎都越来越倾向于非基于知识的测试。我们审视了非基于知识测试的证据,并讨论了它们被认为的益处。我们提出一个问题:目前在英国使用非基于知识的测试是否有破坏衡量医学院和研究生表现的更可靠指标的风险?

相似文献

1
UK medical selection: lottery or meritocracy?英国的医学选拔:靠运气还是凭能力?
Clin Med (Lond). 2015 Feb;15(1):40-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-1-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Situational judgement tests: important clarifications regarding the methodology.情境判断测试:关于方法的重要说明
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 Dec 6;6:219. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000219. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验