• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

邓迪多项迷你面试的预测效度。

Predictive validity of the Dundee multiple mini-interview.

机构信息

Division of Clinical and Population Sciences and Education, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2013 Jul;47(7):717-25. doi: 10.1111/medu.12193.

DOI:10.1111/medu.12193
PMID:23746161
Abstract

CONTEXT

The multiple mini-interview (MMI) is the primary admissions tool used to assess non-cognitive skills at Dundee Medical School. Although the MMI shows promise, more research is required to demonstrate its transferability and predictive validity, for instance, relative to other UK pre-admissions measures.

METHODS

Applicants were selected for interview based on a combination of measures derived from the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) form (academic achievement, medical experience, non-academic achievement and references) and the UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) in 2009 and 2010. Candidates were selected into medical school according to a weighted combination of the UKCAT, the UCAS form and MMI scores. Examination scores were matched for 140 and 128 first- and second-year students, respectively, who took the 2009 MMIs, and 150 first-year students who took the 2010 MMIs. Pearson's correlations were used to test the relationships between pre-admission variables, examination scores and demographic variables, namely gender and age. Statistically significant correlations were adjusted for range restrictions and were used to select variables for multiple linear regression analysis to predict examination scores.

RESULTS

Statistically significant correlations ranged from 0.18 to 0.34 and 0.23 to 0.50 unrestricted. Multiple regression confirmed that MMIs remained the most consistent predictor of medical school assessments. No scores derived from the UCAS form correlated significantly with examination scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports positive findings from the largest undergraduate sample to date. The MMI was the most consistent predictor of success in early years at medical school across two separate cohorts. UKCAT and UCAS forms showed minimal or no predictive ability. Further research in this area appears worthwhile, with longitudinal studies, replication of results from other medical schools and more detailed analysis of knowledge, skills and attitudinal outcome markers.

摘要

背景

多站式迷你面试(MMI)是邓迪医学院用于评估非认知技能的主要招生工具。尽管 MMI 显示出了前景,但需要更多的研究来证明其可转移性和预测有效性,例如相对于其他英国入学前的评估措施。

方法

在 2009 年和 2010 年,根据来自大学和学院招生服务(UCAS)表格(学业成绩、医学经验、非学术成就和推荐信)和英国临床能力倾向测验(UKCAT)的组合措施,选择申请人进行面试。根据 UKCAT、UCAS 表格和 MMI 分数的加权组合,选拔候选人进入医学院。2009 年 MMI 考试的 140 名和 128 名第一和第二学年学生,以及 2010 年 MMI 考试的 150 名第一学年学生,考试成绩相匹配。Pearson 相关系数用于检验入学前变量、考试成绩和人口统计学变量(即性别和年龄)之间的关系。对统计学上显著的相关性进行了范围限制调整,并用于选择变量进行多元线性回归分析,以预测考试成绩。

结果

未受限制的统计学显著相关性范围为 0.18 至 0.34 和 0.23 至 0.50。多元回归证实,MMI 仍然是医学院评估最一致的预测因素。UCAS 表格中的任何分数与考试成绩均无显著相关性。

结论

本研究报告了迄今为止最大的本科生样本的积极发现。在两个独立的队列中,MMI 是预测医学院早期成功的最一致的预测因素。UKCAT 和 UCAS 表格显示出最小或没有预测能力。在这一领域进一步研究似乎是值得的,包括进行纵向研究、复制其他医学院的结果以及更详细地分析知识、技能和态度结果标记。

相似文献

1
Predictive validity of the Dundee multiple mini-interview.邓迪多项迷你面试的预测效度。
Med Educ. 2013 Jul;47(7):717-25. doi: 10.1111/medu.12193.
2
Can the UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) select suitable candidates for interview?英国临床能力倾向测验(UKCAT)能否为面试选拔合适的候选人?
Med Educ. 2011 Oct;45(10):1041-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03993.x.
3
Does the UKCAT predict Year 1 performance in medical school?UKCAT 是否能预测医学院一年级的表现?
Med Educ. 2009 Dec;43(12):1203-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03535.x.
4
Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study.英国临床能力倾向测验在医学院最后几年的预测效度:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Apr 23;14:88. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-88.
5
The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.多次小型面试的效用:一所医学院的经验
Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Mar;29(1):7-14. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2017.48. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
6
Has the UK Clinical Aptitude Test improved medical student selection?英国临床能力倾向测试是否提高了医学生选拔的效果?
Med Educ. 2010 Nov;44(11):1069-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03792.x.
7
Predictive value of the admissions process and the UK Clinical Aptitude Test in a graduate-entry dental school.研究生入学牙科学院招生流程及英国临床能力测试的预测价值。
Br Dent J. 2015 Jul;218(12):687-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.437.
8
The multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of peer evaluations during clinical training in medical school.医学院临床培训期间,多次迷你面试作为同伴评价预测指标的研究
Med Teach. 2016 Nov;38(11):1172-1179. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181730. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
9
Predictors of professional behaviour and academic outcomes in a UK medical school: A longitudinal cohort study.英国一所医学院专业行为和学业成绩的预测因素:一项纵向队列研究。
Med Teach. 2015;37(9):868-80. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009023. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
10
Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees.多站式面试在选拔医学实习生中的预测效度。
Med Educ. 2009 Aug;43(8):767-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03407.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Interactional competencies in medical student admission- what makes a "good medical doctor"?医学生录取中的互动能力——怎样才是一名“优秀的医生”?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Apr;30(2):439-458. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10348-w. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Relationship between admission selection tools and student attrition in the early years of medical school.医学院校早期入学选拔工具与学生流失之间的关系。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2024 Feb 28;19(2):447-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2024.02.004. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Have we got the selection process right? The validity of selection tools for predicting academic performance in the first year of undergraduate medicine.
我们的选拔过程正确吗?本科医学第一年预测学业成绩的选拔工具的有效性。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 Mar 9;6:42. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000042. eCollection 2017.
4
Multiple Mini Interview Performance and Career Maturity related to Medicine.与医学相关的多重迷你面试表现及职业成熟度
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Dec 13;7:284. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000284.1. eCollection 2018.
5
Using MMI Comments for Medical School Admissions Decision-Making.利用多元微型面试评论进行医学院招生决策
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 May 11;7:98. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000098.1. eCollection 2018.
6
MBBS admission criteria as predictor of academic performance in a medical college of Pakistan.作为巴基斯坦一所医学院学术表现预测指标的医学学士入学标准
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Nov-Dec;39(6):1706-1710. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.6839.
7
Multiple mini-interviews is a predictor of students' academic achievements in early undergraduate medical years: a retrospective study.多站式面试是预测医学生本科早期学业成绩的指标:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 27;23(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04183-7.
8
Residency Applicant Perceptions of Multiple Mini Interviews in Post-Graduate Year 1 Residency Interviews.住院医师申请人对研究生一年级住院医师面试中多次迷你面试的看法。
Innov Pharm. 2022 Dec 12;13(2). doi: 10.24926/iip.v13i2.4806. eCollection 2022.
9
Evaluating a Global Assessment Measure Created by Standardized Patients for the Multiple Mini Interview in Medical School Admissions: Mixed Methods Study.评估标准化患者为医学院入学多重迷你面试创建的全球评估指标:混合方法研究
J Particip Med. 2022 Aug 30;14(1):e38209. doi: 10.2196/38209.
10
Are different station formats assessing different dimensions in multiple mini-interviews? Findings from the Canadian integrated French multiple mini-interviews.不同站式的多站式面试评估维度是否不同?来自加拿大综合法语多站式面试的研究结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 12;22(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03681-4.