NESMOS Department, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;76(1):e91-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08956.
Developing safe and effective long-term treatments for bipolar disorder remains a major challenge. Given available treatments, patients with bipolar disorder remain unwell in half of long-term follow-up, mostly in depression. As memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-glutamate receptor antagonist used to treat dementia, has been proposed for testing in bipolar disorder, we carried out a 3 + 3-year, mirror-image, chart-review study of the effects of adding memantine to stably continued, but insufficiently effective, ongoing mood-stabilizing treatments.
Outpatients diagnosed with DSM-IV-TR bipolar disorder (I or II), followed intensively at the Lucio Bini Mood Disorder Center, Rome, Italy, had responded consistently unsatisfactorily to standard treatments (lithium, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, antidepressants, and electroconvulsive therapy) for ≥ 3 years (2005-2013). Memantine (20-30 mg/d) was added clinically to otherwise stable regimens for another 3 years. On the basis of chart review, we compared morbidity measures and Clinical Global Impressions scale for Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) score before versus during memantine treatment.
The 30 bipolar I (n = 17) and II (n = 13) subjects showed consistent morbidity for 3 years before memantine, but improved progressively (r = 0.28, P < .01) over 3 years with memantine (23 ± 4.8 mg/d). Markedly decreased (all P values ≤ .01) were (1) percentage of time ill (total, mania, or depression; averaging -75.0%), (2) CGI-BP severity scores (-67.8%), (3) duration of new episodes (-58.6%), and (4) episodes/year (-55.7%). Subjects with previous rapid or continuous cycling were particularly improved (t = 2.61, P = .016). Adverse effects were mild and rare.
Memantine added substantial long-term benefits by preventing or ameliorating depressive as well as mania-like morbidity in previously consistently poorly responsive patients with bipolar disorder. Further testing in randomized, controlled trials is required.
开发安全有效的治疗双相情感障碍的长期治疗方法仍然是一个主要挑战。鉴于现有的治疗方法,在长期随访的一半时间里,双相情感障碍患者仍然病情不佳,主要表现为抑郁。由于用于治疗痴呆症的 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)谷氨酸受体拮抗剂美金刚已被提议用于双相情感障碍的测试,我们进行了一项为期 3+3 年的镜像图表回顾研究,以评估将美金刚添加到稳定持续但效果不足的现有情绪稳定治疗中的效果。
在意大利罗马的 Lucio Bini 心境障碍中心接受密集随访的被诊断为 DSM-IV-TR 双相情感障碍(I 或 II 型)的门诊患者,对标准治疗(锂、抗惊厥药、抗精神病药、抗抑郁药和电惊厥治疗)的反应持续不满意≥3 年(2005-2013 年)。美金刚(20-30mg/d)以临床方式添加到其他稳定的治疗方案中,再持续 3 年。根据图表回顾,我们比较了美金刚治疗前后发病率衡量标准和双相情感障碍临床总体印象量表(CGI-BP)评分。
30 名双相 I 型(n=17)和 II 型(n=13)患者在美金刚治疗前 3 年内持续出现一致的发病率,但在美金刚治疗 3 年内逐渐改善(r=0.28,P<.01)(23±4.8mg/d)。显著降低(所有 P 值均≤.01)为:(1)患病时间的百分比(总、躁狂或抑郁;平均-75.0%),(2)CGI-BP 严重程度评分(-67.8%),(3)新发发作持续时间(-58.6%),(4)发作/年(-55.7%)。以前快速或连续发作的患者尤其得到改善(t=2.61,P=.016)。不良反应轻微且罕见。
美金刚通过预防或改善先前反应持续不佳的双相情感障碍患者的抑郁样和躁狂样发病率,带来了显著的长期获益。需要进一步进行随机、对照试验测试。