Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity, and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway2Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
JAMA Surg. 2015 Apr;150(4):352-61. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3579.
There is no consensus as to which bariatric procedure is preferred to reduce weight and improve health in patients with a body mass index higher than 50.
To compare 5-year outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (gastric bypass) and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (duodenal switch).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical open-label trial at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Participants were recruited between March 17, 2006, and August 20, 2007, and included 60 patients aged 20 to 50 years with a body mass index of 50 to 60. The current study provides the 5-year follow-up analyses by intent to treat, excluding one participant accepted for inclusion who declined being operated on prior to knowing to what group he was randomized.
Laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch.
Body mass index and secondary outcomes including anthropometric measures, cardiometabolic risk factors, pulmonary function, vitamin status, gastrointestinal symptoms, health-related quality of life, and adverse events.
Sixty patients were randomly assigned and operated on with gastric bypass (n = 31) and duodenal switch (n = 29). Fifty-five patients (92%) completed the study. Five years after surgery, the mean reductions in body mass index were 13.6 (95% CI, 11.0-16.1) and 22.1 (95% CI, 19.5-24.7) after gastric bypass and duodenal switch, respectively. The mean between-group difference was 8.5 (95% CI, 4.9-12.2; P < .001). Remission rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome and changes in blood pressure and lung function were similar between groups. Reductions in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting glucose were significantly greater after duodenal switch compared with gastric bypass. Serum concentrations of vitamin A and 25-hydroxyvitamin D were significantly reduced after duodenal switch compared with gastric bypass. Duodenal switch was associated with more gastrointestinal adverse effects. Health-related quality of life was similar between groups. Patients with duodenal switch underwent more surgical procedures related to the initial procedure (13 [44.8%] vs 3 [9.7%] patients; P = .002) and had significantly more hospital admissions compared with patients with gastric bypass.
In patients with a body mass index of 50 to 60, duodenal switch resulted in greater weight loss and greater improvements in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose levels 5 years after surgery compared with gastric bypass while improvements in health-related quality of life were similar. However, duodenal switch was associated with more surgical, nutritional, and gastrointestinal adverse effects.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00327912.
对于 BMI 高于 50 的患者,哪种减重手术更能减轻体重并改善健康,尚无共识。
比较 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(胃旁路术)和胆胰分流十二指肠转位术(十二指肠转位术)术后 5 年的结果。
设计、地点和参与者:挪威奥斯陆大学医院和瑞典哥德堡萨尔格伦斯卡大学医院的随机临床开放标签试验。参与者于 2006 年 3 月 17 日至 2007 年 8 月 20 日之间招募,包括 60 名年龄在 20 至 50 岁之间、BMI 在 50 至 60 之间的患者。本研究通过意向治疗提供了 5 年随访分析,排除了一名接受纳入但在知道自己被随机分到哪个组之前拒绝手术的参与者。
腹腔镜胃旁路术和腹腔镜十二指肠转位术。
体重指数和次要结局,包括人体测量指标、心血管代谢风险因素、肺功能、维生素状况、胃肠道症状、健康相关生活质量和不良事件。
60 名患者被随机分配并接受胃旁路术(n=31)和十二指肠转位术(n=29)治疗。55 名患者(92%)完成了研究。术后 5 年,胃旁路术和十二指肠转位术的体重指数分别降低 13.6(95%CI,11.0-16.1)和 22.1(95%CI,19.5-24.7)。两组间平均差值为 8.5(95%CI,4.9-12.2;P<0.001)。2 型糖尿病和代谢综合征的缓解率以及血压和肺功能的变化在两组之间相似。与胃旁路术相比,十二指肠转位术后总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯和空腹血糖的降低幅度明显更大。与胃旁路术相比,十二指肠转位术后血清维生素 A 和 25-羟维生素 D 的浓度明显降低。十二指肠转位术与更多与初始手术相关的胃肠道不良事件相关。两组之间的健康相关生活质量相似。十二指肠转位术患者需要进行更多与初始手术相关的手术(13[44.8%]例与 3[9.7%]例;P=0.002),与胃旁路术患者相比,住院治疗的比例也显著更高。
在 BMI 为 50 至 60 的患者中,与胃旁路术相比,十二指肠转位术术后 5 年体重减轻更多,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯和血糖水平改善更大,而健康相关生活质量的改善相似。然而,十二指肠转位术与更多的手术、营养和胃肠道不良事件相关。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00327912。