Zoi Ioanna, Motley Matthew W, Antoniou Dimitri, Schramm Vern L, Schwartz Steven D
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona , 1306 East University Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona 85721, United States.
J Phys Chem B. 2015 Mar 5;119(9):3662-8. doi: 10.1021/jp511983h. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
Recent studies of the bacterial enzymes EcMTAN and VcMTAN showed that they have different binding affinities for the same transition state analogue. This was surprising given the similarity of their active sites. We performed transition path sampling simulations of both enzymes to reveal the atomic details of the catalytic chemical step, which may be the key for explaining the inhibitor affinity differences. Even though all experimental data would suggest the two enzymes are almost identical, subtle dynamic differences manifest in differences of reaction coordinate, transition state structure, and eventually significant differences in inhibitor binding. Unlike EcMTAN, VcMTAN has multiple distinct transition states, which is an indication that multiple sets of coordinated protein motions can reach a transition state. Reaction coordinate information is only accessible from transition path sampling approaches, since all experimental approaches report averages. Detailed knowledge could have a significant impact on pharmaceutical design.
最近对细菌酶EcMTAN和VcMTAN的研究表明,它们对同一过渡态类似物具有不同的结合亲和力。鉴于它们活性位点的相似性,这一结果令人惊讶。我们对这两种酶都进行了过渡路径采样模拟,以揭示催化化学步骤的原子细节,这可能是解释抑制剂亲和力差异的关键。尽管所有实验数据都表明这两种酶几乎相同,但在反应坐标、过渡态结构的差异中表现出微妙的动态差异,最终在抑制剂结合方面存在显著差异。与EcMTAN不同,VcMTAN有多个不同的过渡态,这表明多组协调的蛋白质运动可以达到一个过渡态。反应坐标信息只能从过渡路径采样方法中获得,因为所有实验方法报告的都是平均值。详细的知识可能会对药物设计产生重大影响。