Suppr超能文献

在自由观看中,固定持续时间超过瞳孔大小,成为衡量记忆负荷的指标。

Fixation duration surpasses pupil size as a measure of memory load in free viewing.

机构信息

Laboratory for Perceptual Dynamics, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 21;8:1063. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01063. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Oculomotor behavior reveals, not only the acquisition of visual information at fixation, but also the accumulation of information in memory across subsequent fixations. Two candidate measures were considered as indicators of such dynamic visual memory load: fixation duration and pupil size. While recording these measures, we displayed an arrangement of 3, 4 or 5 targets among distractors. Both occurred in various orientations. Participants searched for targets and reported whether in a subsequent display one of them had changed orientation. We determined to what extent fixation duration and pupil size indicate dynamic memory load, as a function of the number of targets fixated during the search. We found that fixation duration reflects the number of targets, both when this number is within and above the limit of working memory capacity. Pupil size reflects the number of targets only when it exceeds the capacity limit. Moreover, the duration of fixations on successive targets but not on distractors increases whereas pupil size does not. The increase in fixation duration with number of targets both within and above working memory capacity suggests that in free viewing fixation duration is sensitive to actual memory load as well as to processing load, whereas pupil size is indicative of processing load only. Two alternative models relating visual attention and working memory are considered relevant to these results. We discuss the results as supportive of a model which involves a temporary buffer in the interaction of attention and working memory.

摘要

眼动行为不仅揭示了在注视时获取视觉信息的情况,还揭示了在随后的注视中信息在记忆中的积累情况。有两种候选指标被认为可以反映这种动态视觉记忆负荷:注视持续时间和瞳孔大小。在记录这些指标的同时,我们在干扰项中显示了 3、4 或 5 个目标的排列。这些目标以不同的方向出现。参与者搜索目标,并报告在随后的显示中是否有一个目标的方向发生了变化。我们确定了注视持续时间和瞳孔大小在多大程度上反映了动态记忆负荷,这取决于搜索过程中注视的目标数量。我们发现,当目标数量在工作记忆容量范围内和超过工作记忆容量时,注视持续时间都反映了目标数量。瞳孔大小仅在目标数量超过容量限制时才反映目标数量。此外,连续目标上的注视持续时间增加,而不是在干扰项上增加,而瞳孔大小则没有增加。在工作记忆容量范围内和超过工作记忆容量时,随着目标数量的增加,注视持续时间的增加表明,在自由观察中,注视持续时间不仅对实际记忆负荷敏感,而且对处理负荷敏感,而瞳孔大小仅对处理负荷敏感。两种与视觉注意力和工作记忆相关的替代模型被认为与这些结果相关。我们讨论了这些结果,支持了一种涉及注意力和工作记忆相互作用中的临时缓冲区的模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a49/4301010/f2f5c30e1ae2/fnhum-08-01063-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验