Department of Emergency Psychiatry, St Görans Hospital, SE-112 81, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatric Research and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Statisticon AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2015 Feb;5(1):13-21. doi: 10.1177/2045125314560740.
The objective of this work was to study characteristics and clinical treatment patterns of bipolar disorder (BD) patients admitted to hospital and treated with quetiapine (immediate-release [IR] or extended-release [XR] formulations).
BD patients admitted to hospital and prescribed quetiapine IR were followed by linking two Swedish nationwide registries; the hospitalization and drug dispense registries [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01455961]. The study period was from 1 January 2008, to end of 31 December 2011. Data was primarily analysed using descriptive methods.
Quetiapine IR was used in 1761 patients of whom 1303 subsequently switched to XR (switch XR) and 458 remained on IR (continuous IR). At baseline, Switch XR patients were younger (-3.3 years), more frequently employed (+7.1%), had higher prevalence of single depressive episodes (+6.7%) and anxiety disorders (+5.8%), lower mean daily IR dose (-19.3%) and fewer medications for somatic disorders (-7.5%) than continuous IR patients. During follow up, the number of concomitant psychiatric medications was lower in switch XR patients (-6%) and higher in continuous IR patients (+6%). Mean daily quetiapine dose was 21% higher in switch XR versus continuous IR patients. Prescriptions of lower quetiapine dosages calculated below 50 mg per day in the XR switch and IR continuous groups were seen in 8% versus 10% of the patients, respectively.
Differential use of quetiapine XR and IR in bipolar disorder patients with different and important characteristics was demonstrated. Patients who were switched to quetiapine XR had a higher psychiatric disease burden, were younger and had a higher degree of employment. These differences demonstrate the heterogeneity among bipolar disorder patients and indicate the need in clinical practice for individualized treatment to reduce the risk for both patient and society related losses.
本研究旨在分析因双相障碍(BD)入院并接受喹硫平(速释[IR]或缓释[XR]制剂)治疗的患者的特征和临床治疗模式。
通过链接瑞典两个全国性注册中心,对因 BD 入院并接受喹硫平 IR 治疗的患者进行随访;这两个注册中心分别为住院和药物配给登记处[ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01455961]。研究期间为 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日。主要采用描述性方法对数据进行分析。
1761 例患者使用了喹硫平 IR,其中 1303 例随后换用 XR(换用 XR),458 例继续使用 IR(持续 IR)。在基线时,换用 XR 患者更年轻(-3.3 岁)、更频繁地工作(+7.1%)、单相抑郁发作的患病率更高(+6.7%)和焦虑障碍(+5.8%)、IR 日剂量更低(-19.3%)和躯体疾病用药更少(-7.5%)。在随访期间,换用 XR 患者同时使用的精神科药物数量减少(-6%),而持续 IR 患者则增加(+6%)。换用 XR 患者的喹硫平日剂量平均增加 21%,而 XR 换用和 IR 持续组中分别有 8%和 10%的患者服用较低剂量(<50mg/天)的喹硫平。
不同且重要特征的 BD 患者对喹硫平 XR 和 IR 的使用存在差异。换用 XR 的患者精神疾病负担更重、更年轻且就业比例更高。这些差异表明了 BD 患者存在异质性,提示临床实践中需要个体化治疗,以降低患者和社会相关损失的风险。