Grant A, Leigh-Phippard H, Short N P
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 May;22(4):278-86. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12188. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
Some of the complexities of recovery and survival are arguably relatively neglected in current UK mental health nursing policy and, by association, clinical and research practice. In order to redress this, this paper, part of larger research project, will present two short stories, contextualized in a critical theoretical and methodological position. The overall significance of the argument in the paper is in its emerging benefits and implications for users of mental health services, practitioners and researchers. The central, orienting principle in the paper, cohering with all of its strands, is 'narrative re-storying'. Organized in three parts, the first reviews selected relevant background policy and related literature, the contextual and theoretical bases of the paper, and related methodological and ethical issues. The second presents the two stories, and the third brings the paper to a close. It does so in discussing specific and global emerging implications for mental health nursing practice and research, around narrative re-storying as a recovery tool and methodological innovations that include 'hybrid' writing.
在当前英国心理健康护理政策中，以及与之相关的临床和研究实践中，恢复和生存的一些复杂性可以说相对被忽视了。为了纠正这一点，作为一个更大研究项目的一部分，本文将呈现两个短篇小说，并将其置于批判性理论和方法论的背景下。本文论点的总体意义在于其对心理健康服务使用者、从业者和研究人员的新益处及影响。本文的核心导向原则，贯穿其所有脉络，是“叙事重述”。本文分为三个部分，第一部分回顾了相关的背景政策和相关文献、本文的背景和理论基础，以及相关的方法论和伦理问题。第二部分呈现了这两个故事，第三部分结束本文。它通过讨论围绕叙事重述作为一种恢复工具以及包括“混合”写作在内的方法论创新，对心理健康护理实践和研究产生的具体和总体新影响来做到这一点。
