Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141, Milan, Italy,
Radiol Med. 2015 Jul;120(7):611-7. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0505-5. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
The authors sought to evaluate the effect of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) on the sensitivity of ground-glass nodule (GGN) detection at different dose levels.
Fifty-four artificial GGN were randomly divided into three sets, each positioned in an anthropomorphic phantom. The three sets were evaluated on standard-dose (SD, 350 mA), low-dose (LD, 35 mA) and ultra-low-dose (ULD, 10 mA) CT scans (100 kV, 64 × 0.625 mm, 0.5 s), and each scan was reconstructed twice with filtered back projection (FBP) and MBIR. Three radiologists independently evaluated the scans for GGN presence and size. SD + FBP was considered the reference standard. A region of interest (ROI) was used to calculate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio normalised to dose (CNRD). McNemar's test, Bland-Altman analysis and t test were used for statistical assessment (p < 0.05).
The mean diameter of the 54 GGNs was 9.2 mm (range 3.7-17.3 mm). For the three readers, no statistically significant differences were observed in the sensitivity of GGN detection between LD + MBIR, ULD + MBIR and SD + FBP (p > 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed a good reader agreement (±1.5 mm) for GGN size between SD + FBP and ULD + MBIR. For low dose and ultra-low dose, the SNR and CNRD were significantly higher with MBIR (p < 0.0001). The effective dose was 97.1 % lower with ultra-low dose (0.15 mSv) than standard dose (5.15 mSv).
The detection of GGN with MBIR at low-dose and ultra-low-dose CT does not differ significantly from standard-dose CT with FBP in an anthropomorphic phantom.
作者旨在评估基于模型的迭代重建(MBIR)对不同剂量水平下磨玻璃结节(GGN)检测灵敏度的影响。
54 个人工 GGN 随机分为三组,每组置于一个人体模型中。三组分别在标准剂量(SD,350mA)、低剂量(LD,35mA)和超低剂量(ULD,10mA)CT 扫描(100kV,64×0.625mm,0.5s)下进行评估,每个扫描分别使用滤波反投影(FBP)和 MBIR 重建两次。三位放射科医生独立评估扫描是否存在 GGN 及其大小。SD+FBP 被认为是参考标准。使用感兴趣区域(ROI)计算信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)归一化剂量(CNRD)。采用 McNemar 检验、Bland-Altman 分析和 t 检验进行统计学评估(p<0.05)。
54 个 GGN 的平均直径为 9.2mm(范围 3.7-17.3mm)。对于三位读者,LD+MBIR、ULD+MBIR 和 SD+FBP 之间的 GGN 检测灵敏度无统计学差异(p>0.05)。Bland-Altman 分析显示,SD+FBP 和 ULD+MBIR 之间 GGN 大小的读者间一致性良好(±1.5mm)。对于低剂量和超低剂量,MBIR 时 SNR 和 CNRD 显著升高(p<0.0001)。超低剂量(0.15mSv)的有效剂量比标准剂量(5.15mSv)低 97.1%。
在人体模型中,低剂量和超低剂量 CT 采用 MBIR 检测 GGN 的灵敏度与 FBP 标准剂量 CT 无显著差异。